(HANSARD) in the third session of the fifty-second parliament of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland commencing on the seventh day of may in the forty-sixth year of the reign of
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II
VOLUME DCXII SIXTH VOLUME OF SESSION 1999--2000 House of Lords
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord Bassam of Brighton): My Lords, the report makes 21 recommendations to the Director-General of the Prison Service and one to the Home Secretary. Of the recommendations, 14 have been accepted in principle and two rejected wholly or in part. The remaining seven recommendations are still under consideration.
Our response to this helpful report has been guided by the principle that any recommendation which has the potential to increase the risk to prison staff or other prisoners will simply not be accepted.
The Earl of Longford: My Lords, I apply limited enthusiasm to that guarded Answer from my noble and much esteemed friend the Minister. He is aware, of course, that the report is highly critical of the arrangements for looking after these very difficult prisoners. I wish to ask him two questions of which he has been given slight notice, although he may not have had time to consider them. First, does he realise that the chief inspector is calling for a totally new approach to supposedly dangerous prisoners? I turn to the particular. I am referring now to someone called
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, we welcomed the report, which was both helpful and constructive. It is perhaps worth reminding your Lordships of the opening paragraph of the inspector's report. It states:
As to Charles Bronson, it is not the case that he is sleeping on a concrete bed. He is sleeping on a concrete plinth, but the fact is that it has normal bedding material, including a mattress and bed clothing, placed on it. His cell does have a window. He has a cardboard solid chair and table and a fixed notice board. He is allowed a number of personal items. The reason he lives in those very constrained circumstances is that he poses a profound risk to staff and there is a very long record of that. The Prison Service has to take pay careful regard to the danger he presents not just to other prisoners, and not just to prison officers, but also, on occasions, to himself.
Lord Dholakia: My Lords, is the Minister aware that there are high-security inmates in this establishment? Does he accept that the regime has been oppressive? Does he further accept that the test of a civilised prison
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, the test of any civilised society is that it can contain its prison population in a highly civilised and humane way. However, as I said earlier, there are just 40 prisoners within this special category of supervision. The noble Lord suggests that we should undertake research into best practice internationally. I can advise your Lordships' House and the noble Lord that there is no established best practice. We are attempting to establish precisely the best possible practice. We intend to conduct further research into the issue because we realise that it is difficult, as the inspector recognised, to hold such prisoners in our prison system.
The Earl of Listowel: My Lords, does the Minister agree that many of the prisoners in this institution will have come from deprived families and will have very little education behind them? Does he not further agree that the Government's Sure Start programme, which seeks to intervene in order to help children and families by supporting them early, is welcome in terms of reducing the number of such institutions and the need for them in the future?
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, I cannot possibly comment on Sure Start; that is a different programme from a different department. Obviously, any contribution that it makes in the long term to eradicating the more severe forms of personality disorder of which these prisoners are a reflection is welcome. Such prisoners are at the extreme of personal behaviour. For that reason, great care has to be taken regarding how they are managed through the system and through the prison estate.
Lord Cope of Berkeley: My Lords, does the Minister appreciate that he has the support of these Benches in setting the safety of prison officers and staff as the first priority in the case of difficult and violent prisoners? On a detailed point, will the Minister comment on what I understand to be the case; namely, that the boards of visitors have been cut out of the decision-making process by the new set-up? I am not at all sure that that is desirable.
Lord Bassam of Brighton: My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his continued support for the measures that we take to deal with violent prisoners of this kind. As to boards of visitors, there are only two establishments involved as close supervision centres. It is our view that it is important to have a special advisory group; therefore, a new CSC advisory group is to be established. That indicates that the issue of accountability in the system is being seriously addressed. The group will advise the Prison Service,
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (Lord Whitty): My Lords, we shall shortly consult on the draft strategy, which will include policy, fiscal and regulatory measures. The forthcoming key measures already announced for good-quality CHP include exemption from the climate change levy, eligibility for enhanced capital allowances and de-rating of plant and machinery. We are implementing a CHP quality assurance programme to determine eligibility for these benefits. We are also launching a CHP club to provide integrated support to encourage new schemes.
Lord Ezra: My Lords, I thank the Minister for that informative response. Before asking my supplementary question, I should like to state that I am chairman of a combined heat and power company in Sheffield which generates what is known as "green" energy, or environmentally friendly energy, to many of the premises in that city. Naturally, for that and other reasons, I strongly support the Government's measures in favour of combined heat and power. However, will the Minister explain the anomaly arising from the climate change levy and the new electricity trading arrangements which would bear down on CHP? In regard to the climate change levy, why is it that if CHP electricity is supplied to users it does not bear the levy, but if it is supplied through electricity suppliers, it does? In line with the Government's strong support for combined heat and power, will they put right these anomalies, and in particular the anomaly to which I have referred?
Lord Whitty: My Lords, the noble Lord is correct in saying that good-quality CHP is exempt from the levy where the electricity is consumed on site, internally, and where it is sold direct to other customers. It is the treatment of CHP electricity in the grid, to use "old-speak", that is not exempt from the levy. That is consistent with all other electricity which is sold via licensed suppliers. The Government consider that the other support that we are providing for CHP among the measures to which I referred in my earlier Answer will be sufficient to allow CHP a significant advantage and will, therefore, contribute to the target that we set out in the climate change programme.
|Next Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|