Memorandum by the Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs
2002 (S.I. 2002/240)
Article 2(1) defines various expressions used
in the Order "unless the context otherwise requires".
Identify the provisions in which the defined expressions are intended
to have another meanings.
1. The Department agrees that the inclusion of the
wording of this drafting convention are superfluous in this Order.
Article 9(1) is expressed to be subject to paragraph
(3) of that article and to article 10. Explain how those provisions
qualify article 9 (1).
2. The effect of article 9(1) is to require a sheep
or goat which is being moved to be marked as described in one
or more of the sub-paragraphs (a) to (f).
3. This requirement does not apply in the circumstances
set out in paragraph (3). A sheep or goat being moved to or from
a show is required to be marked with an individual identification
number together with the Mark which was applied at the same time.
This may or may not amount to an identification as described in
one of the sub-paragraphs in article 9(1). For example, a sheep
or goat marked in accordance with article 9(1)(b) could not be
moved to a show, notwithstanding that article 9(1) was satisfied,
since it would be lacking the individual identification number
required by article 9(3).
4. Paragraph 9(1) requires an animal which is being
moved to be marked with one or more from the list of six Marks
or identifying combinations described in sub-paragraphs (a) to
(f). This does not however allow an animal to be marked with an
unlimited number of these identifiers. Article 9(1) should be
read with article 10 which restricts the maximum number of marks
by prohibiting a person from applying an S Mark to an animal which
already bears two or three of certain specified marks.
Explain why the subdivisions in article 9(4) are
numbered (a), (c) and (e) instead of (i), (ii) and (iii).
5. We agree that the sub-divisions in article 9(4)
were incorrectly numbered on the signed copy of the Order and
should have been numbered (i), (ii) and (iii). No other provisions
cross-refer to article 9(4). Since no change of substance is involved
we propose to correct the errors on the printed copy.