Tax avoidance: the role of large accountancy firms (follow-up) - Public Accounts Committee Contents


Introduction


We have reported previously our long-standing concerns about multinational companies avoiding tax, the role played by tax advisers in promoting company structures designed to avoid tax, and the effectiveness of HMRC and HM Treasury in tackling these problems. We have published relevant reports in December 2012, April 2013 and June 2013. In evidence used for our April 2013 report, the Head of Tax at PwC had told us that "we are not in the business of selling schemes". In November 2014 the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) published documents showing that PwC negotiated advance tax rulings for many hundreds of companies with the Luxembourg tax authorities. Media attention focussed on the complex financial strategies employed by a small number of companies on the advice of PwC. The published documents appeared inconsistent with PwC's previous evidence to us, as they suggested PwC had been promoting complex structures that are similar in nature to numerous clients. We therefore invited PWC's Head of Tax to give further evidence, alongside the Director of Tax at Shire Pharmaceuticals, one of the firms on which media attention had focussed. Many other major firms were named in the Luxembourg tax rulings published by the ICIJ and our concerns go wider than the behaviour of PwC and Shire alone. Our conclusions and recommendations are therefore relevant to the tax advisory industry and its clients as a whole.


 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2015
Prepared 6 February 2015