Examination of Witness (Questions 434-446)
MR GORDON
BROWN MP
20 OCTOBER 2009
Q434 Chairman: Good morning, I would
like to welcome the Prime Minister, and also the Leader of the
Opposition and the Leader of the Liberal Democrats who will be
following, to the Speaker's Conference. This is a very important
occasion for the future of the House of Commons. The House can
do its job effectively only if its Members are in tune with the
experiences of the population as a whole. Part of that is making
sure that the House reflects more nearly the increasingly diverse
society in which we live. However, at present, Members of Parliament,
including their Leaders and their Speaker, are for the most part
white, male, middle aged and middle class. That is why this Speaker's
Conference was established last year to look into the reasons
why women, members of the ethnic minorities and disabled people
are underrepresented in the House of Commons, and to recommend
ways in which the situation can be improved. The Conference has
also agreed to consider issues relating to the representation
of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities. The
close involvement of the Speaker in the Conference demonstrates
the importance which the House attaches to the issue of fairer
representation. This Conference began under the leadership of
the former Speaker, Michael Martin; it was set up, of course,
at the instigation of the Prime Minister, and I am very glad to
continue its work. I also wish at the outset to pay a particularly
warm tribute to the Vice-Chairman, Anne Begg, who has led the
evidence gathering work of the Conference with great vigour and
determination. She and her colleagues have put the Conference
in a position in which today it can ask the leaders what they
and their parties are planning to do to make sure that the House
more closely reflects our society in the future. Before we start,
I should simply set out what my role will be in today's session.
I will preside over the session in the manner of a neutral chair
of a Public Bill Committee, exercising control and facilitating
participation, rather than as a conventional Select Committee
Chairman who puts questions him or herself to witnesses. I am
the leader of the good order and fair play party. The Conference
has offered each of the leaders a chance to make a brief opening
statement before answering your questions. Prime Minister?
Mr Brown: Well,
there have been in our Parliamentary history only five Speaker's
Conferences. They are summoned only when great issues vital to
our democracy demand debate and then decision. The greatest of
injustices demands the boldest of actions, so it was the first
Speaker's Conference in 1916 that opened the way to guaranteeing
the right to vote for women, and so it is today, when great injustice
arises from discrimination and prejudice on grounds of race, gender,
disability and sexual orientation. Some of those who sit on this
Conference are those who have done most over recent years to address
these inequalities and to plead for justice. When I entered Parliament
in 1983, the House of Commons was an all white chamber. There
were only 23 women, a House of Commons where 50 per cent of the
population had only 3 per cent of the representation. I am proud
of the record in extending representation over these last 25 years,
but we have not done enough yet to address under-representation
in our society. Seen from the outside, Parliament is not yet fit
for the 21st century. So I want to suggest areas where we will
move fast as a party and as a government to make change possible.
For women, we want to advance further, and on a like for like
basis, I expect the number of women Labour MPs in Parliament to
rise to between 120 and 140 after the next election. The Equality
Bill will extend all-women shortlists until 2030, and I hope there
will be general support for this. On black and Asian representation,
we will make sure that in relevant constituencies, a majority
on the shortlist are black and Asian candidates. That will follow
the passage of the Equality Bill. On disabled representation,
we recognise the barriers of access, in some cases finance and
prejudice to disabled candidates seeking selection, and we are
determined to offer the greatest of practical support to make
that possible. We will increase support for LGBT candidates, and
I have said that there is a way that we can deal with some of
the prejudice. Just as marriages can take place in the presence
of the House of Commons, I hope Mr Speaker will consider that
civil partnerships should be celebrated here too, and I hope that
he and the House authorities will consider this idea. I am committed
to diversity in Parliament, not just because it is at the heart
of our Labour Party values, but because it is also in the interests
of the whole country, that we keep the promise of our democracy,
not for some but for all the people of Britain. I do not believe
that sexism, racism and disability discrimination are indelibly
woven into the fabric of our society, but it is our duty as Parliamentarians
to lead the way in a process that in this generation can end the
discrimination and prejudice that exists, and make our Parliament
a Parliament where all people feel that they are fully represented.
Q435 Miss Begg: Thank you for appearing
before us, Prime Minister. I am just wondering whether you are
satisfied with the speed of change to date and the speed of change
that you have just outlined, and whether you think that with recent
events, and the way that perhaps Parliament itself has been brought
into disrepute, has actually made the whole job of increasing
the diversity of Parliament even more difficult?
Mr Brown: If the final conclusion
of all the various reviews, including the Legg and then the Kelly
review, were to give the impression that the only people who could
afford to be Members of Parliament are people who have very substantial
incomes or wealth in the first place before they are considered
as representatives, then that would be a very big blow to the
opportunities and possibilities of people from poorer backgrounds,
low income backgrounds and backgrounds where there are huge barriers
to overcome to get into Parliament. So we must ensure in everything
that we do that we do not create new barriers to representation.
As far as being satisfied with progress, I am not. That is why
I am saying that we will do more to make sure that women are properly
represented in Parliament. In the Welsh Assembly and in the Scottish
Parliament, it is more than 50 per cent. On our Labour Party National
Executive Committee, it is 50 per cent. I believe what we are
doing for women's representation is not a top down enforcement
of rules, but a bottom up process which over a period of time
is increasing the representation of women at a local party level,
then at a council level, and also at a Parliamentary European
and Welsh and Scottish Parliament level. So I believe that is
a bottom up process as well as the enforcement of all-women shortlists.
On the question of disabled Members of Parliament, I do believe
that you have yourself sent a huge signal by the success that
you have had as a Member of Parliament, but I am conscious that
there are only 2.5 per cent of our candidates who are people who
are self-declared as disabled. We must therefore try to remove
whatever barriers do exist, and I recognise that some of them
have to be financial, as well as access, mobility and everything
else, to representation. On the question of black and ethnic minority
representation, we have made progress by making sure that in every
selection committee, a branch will be able to nominate someone
from the black and Asian community. We are proposing to make further
progress by saying that in some constituencies, a majority of
people on the shortlist when it comes to the members for final
decision would be ethnic minority representatives.
Q436 Ms Abbott: I listened to your
statement with care, and I welcomed the fact that you had a target
for the number of Labour women MPs you want to see after the election,
120-140. But I notice you did not have a target for the number
of black and minority ethnic Members of Parliament. The fact is
it is 22 years ago that I was selected for Parliament, and 22
years later, we have just two black women Members of Parliament.
It was 22 years ago that my colleagues Paul Boateng and Bernie
Grant were selected as Members of Parliament, and 22 years later,
we have just two Members of Parliament of African or African Caribbean
background. What I wanted to ask you is what makes you think that
having, as you put it, relevant constituencies, and I find that
a slightly problematic formulation, because some of our best black
and minority ethnic MPs do not sit for relevant constituencies
at all, but what makes you think that in relevant constituencies,
having a majority of ethnic minorities on the shortlist will actually
produce more black and ethnic minority candidates? The truth is
that the biggest bar to diversity in selection is the ever present
favourite son candidate, and the system you are proposing, which
is to have a majority of ethnic minorities on the shortlist, will
still allow the favourite son to occupy his position and be rammed
through in the end.
Q437 Chairman: Prime Minister, there
are others who want to come in on this as well.
Mr Brown: You are absolutely right,
there is a great deal more progress to be made, and it is far
slower than I would have wanted, but let us remember, the Labour
Party has made possible the first black person elected to Parliament,
the first black Cabinet Minister, the first Asian Cabinet Minister.
We have four times more representation than the other parties
put together. We are 88 per cent of the representation in the
House of Commons, but I accept it is not enough. Why do I think
that the things we are proposing will make a difference? Because
they are already making a difference in the selection of candidates
for the next election. We have seen a larger number particularly
of women from black and Asian representation being selected in
seats for the next election, but we will go further by saying
that in certain constituencies, and that is a matter for debate,
so I accept it is a matter for debate, but we want to make sure
that a majority of people on that shortlist are from the black
and Asian community. Look, this has taken more time than we would
have wanted, but nobody can imagine now a situation, as I came
into Parliament in 1983, where only 23 Members were women, and
there were no black and Asian Members at all. That is an inconceivable
situation now for a country like this. Now we have to make the
further progress, but I believe it will happen in the next few
years.
Q438 Jo Swinson: Despite the success
of all-women shortlists and electing many more women MPs, there
are still very few women who at the time of being elected had
young children. Do you think that ensuring we have better representation
of parents in Parliament is important, and if so, what will you
do to tackle some of the difficulties faced by those with young
families, both as candidates and then as MPs?
Mr Brown: I am grateful for you
recognising the importance of all-women shortlists, that is what
we have done as a Labour Party, I would urge other parties to
consider doing this. I recognise also that when I came into Parliament,
there was noHarriet Harman had just come into Parliament
and launched a campaign for proper cre"che facilities for
women Members of Parliament. We have to go further in making it
possible for families to be properly catered for, if one of the
partners are Members of Parliament. A great deal more has to be
done on that front as well. I think it is something that you,
Mr Speaker, have taken an interest in improving, and I think that
would be very important as well. But again, we have to recognise
that MPsand this is one of the things that comes out of
Legg, and also comes out of what will be in, I suppose, the Kelly
review, you have to recognise that people are living in two places
at once, they have family responsibilities, and there has to be
some place for showing that the financial arrangements for MPs
take account of that.
Q439 Mr Dhanda: Prime Minister, let
us look at what you personally can do. Your top table, your Cabinet,
there are 23 members in it. When you became Prime Minister, your
predecessor left two minority ethnic Cabinet members. There are
none now, yet there are four white Scottish men. Do you think
this is an acceptable state of affairs? Do you think you personally
can do more to correct that?
Mr Brown: Well, I think you are
looking at the peopleI would point you to the people who
sit at the Cabinet table.
Q440 Mr Dhanda: I am talking about
Cabinet members.
Mr Brown: Yes, but I would point
to people who sit at the Cabinet table, because there are people
who sit at the Cabinet table who do not necessarily hold a full
departmental responsibility, but are equally important to the
running of the government. I would say that there are seven women
sitting round the Cabinet table; we have the first Asian Cabinet
Minister sitting at the Cabinet table representing issues of transport;
and at the same time we have the Attorney General, who is the
first black Attorney General, and a very successful one at that.
So I would ask you to look at the wider picture. We have not done
what other governments have done in terms of Scottish, Welsh and
Irish, or considered, in terms of Scottish, Welsh and Irish representation;
we have a separate Secretary of State for Scotland, a Secretary
of State for Wales and a Secretary of State for Northern Ireland
and that has to be taken into account in how you form your Cabinet.
Q441 Mrs Williams: Prime Minister,
you mentioned the bottom up process in your earlier answer. If
there is resistance locally and regionally within the Labour Party
concerning diversity, promoting diversity, how do you propose
to tackle those issues?
Mr Brown: I think bottom up is
the way in the long run that is going to make the huge difference.
I do think the declaration that there will be all-women shortlists
has made a huge difference in the way women are represented in
Parliament. I just should emphasise, maybe in answer to Parmjit's
question, that there are 35 women Ministers in the government,
as well as seven round the Cabinet table, and that is far higher
than at any time in the past. Equally, I would say, on this bottom
up process, it really does depend on at a local level the encouragement
and support being given. So Emily's List has been very important,
Bernie's List in terms of black and Asian representation, Dorothy's
List in relation to LGBT representation, all these have been important
to establishing and encouraging the principle that more women,
more disabled people, more black and ethnic minority people should
be represented in Parliament, as well as lesbian and gays.
Q442 Andrew George: You have some
very admirable objectives and targets with regard to black, women
and disabled candidates in future, but, of course, all of these
are delivered through locally made decisions in local constituency
parties, as far as the candidates that are selected. How far are
you prepared to go in order to ensure that those locally made
decisions follow a pattern which actually help you deliver those
targets? Are you prepared to overrule decisions made which will
otherwise divert you away from achieving your objectives?
Mr Brown: Well, you have controversial
issues locally, as we had in one Welsh constituency in the last
election, which everybody is aware of. But it is not simply leaving
it to local people to make the decision: when we impose all-women
shortlists, that is a national decision that has been made, that
is being implemented at a local level. Again, I say we are the
party that has made the decision to do this, it has been proven
that that makes a difference in the numbers of women who are represented
in Parliament. I hope that other parties can consider doing that,
and our Equality Bill will make that possible, so that it does
not stop at a particular date in the near future, but goes right
through and is an encouragement to young women to come forward,
because it will be in existence until 2030.
Q443 Ms Abbott: It is one thing to
talk about having more diverse candidates, but the important thing
is to have diverse candidates in seats that are either solid Labour
seats or are very winnable. All-women shortlists have proved to
be a tried and tested way of getting women in for those sorts
of seats. Why are you opposed to all black and minority ethnic
shortlists?
Mr Brown: The principle must be
that we are removing discrimination, and creating a House of Commons
that is more representative of the nation as a whole. 50 per cent
of the population are women, and the under-representation of women
historically, we have found, can only be addressed by all-women
shortlists. 11 per cent of the population come from black, Asian
or minority populations, and our determination to increase that
representation is, as I suggested, by taking measures that at
a local level encourage constituencies that this is the right
thing to do. Our aim, of course, is to get a House of Commons,
a Parliament that more accurately reflects all the faces and the
different ethnic groups of our country. So that is our aim; how
we get to that aim, of course, is going to be different in different
cases and bound to be so, but the principle that we should have
far greater representation for black and Asian communities, and
for black and Asian MPs to be represented in the House of Commons,
is shown in our determination to move forward with what we say.
At a local level, a branch has the power to ensure that there
is a black and Asian person on the branch nomination, there is
a guarantee that there will be someone from that community who
is on the shortlist, and now we are saying we are prepared to
go even further than that, and I think we are the first party
to do that.
Q444 Mrs Cryer: Prime Minister, can
I just ask you about the difficulties for people from a poorer
background of the costs of candidacy? You have already said that
it would be unfortunate if only wealthy candidates could go forward.
It would also be unfortunate if only people locally could go forward,
because of the costs of travelling. So can I ask you, how can
we ensure that candidates with different levels of income and
different campaigning costs, such as disabled people, single parents,
have an equal chance of being and later winning through to being
a Member of Parliament?
Mr Brown: Well, I think there
is potentially an issue of finance there. It is not necessarily
solved by issues like primaries, which are very expensive, although
there is a case for looking at primaries, but there is an issue
of finance for people from low income backgrounds, and that has
to be addressed internally by the parties themselves. I think
we also have to recognise that there is another point about what
people expect MPs now to be able to do is to be far more active
locally in their own constituencies, and be far more connected
to the causes and communities of their own constituencies, and
to be able to reflect them. I think that is a duty on MPs that
has been imposed by the public, most of us willingly accept that
duty, but it is a huge change from where we were 30 years ago.
It makes it necessary, and I think we have to emphasise this,
that MPs have to have a base both in London and in their constituencies,
and any reform of the system relating to MPs that does not recognise
that will be falling very short of the mark of what the public
expect of Members of Parliament now.
Q445 Angela Browning: Prime Minister,
there is cross-party agreement that the approximate costs of fighting
as a candidate are about £10,000 a year, so for many candidates,
they are looking at £40,000 or £50,000 to fight a seat
for a whole Parliament before they even get elected. Particularly
for women with childcare costs, or people with disabilities, as
Ann Cryer mentioned, how do you see that challenge to get more
women in, who have those attendant costs, just to get into Parliament?
Mr Brown: I recognise that there
are costs. I am not sure if I have the same figures as you about
what it actually costs. Obviously it depends on the time that
a person is selected, and the distances they have to travel, and
it depends on what their home arrangements are. But I recognise
that it is more difficult for people who have family responsibilities.
The one thing that we want to encourage is that people who are
more representative of the face of our nation are standing as
candidates for Parliament, so yes, you have to look at how you
can encourage that, and you have to look at how as a party you
can defer some of the expenses that are involved in people being
candidates once they become candidates. This is maybe something
that your Conference may have to look at in more detail, but I
am sure that our party is trying to deal with these issues and
I hope other parties are. Can I just say on women, I do repeat,
we made a decision to have all-women shortlists, we believe that
that has worked. I would urge other parties to look at this issue.
We have made a decision on black and Asian candidates, that we
will give full rights to be at a selection committee, and in some
cases to be a majority of candidates at selection committee, once
the Equality Bill goes through. No other party has done that,
I urge people to do that. Where there have been changes made by
one political party that other parties can now see have brought
beneficial results, I think it is better for them to look at whether
they can implement these changes, than perhaps some of the other
things you are looking at at the moment.
Q446 Miss Begg: Our Interim Report[1]
suggested that local parties should provide data for the various
selection processes, and the Labour Party did provide that data.
Can I ask if you are prepared to sign the Labour Party up to constantly
reporting the data on all the selection processes and panels that
take place under the criteria that we use or we recommend in our
Interim Report?
Mr Brown: You are absolutely right,
unless people know what is happening, then the public opinion
that is being shaped about this cannot put the pressure that is
necessary on the parties to change. This is not just a matter
of one or two individuals, and there are heroic individuals around
this table, on this committee, who have themselves brought about
great changes by what they have done. I think it is fair that
at this stage, I applaud people round this table who have been
change makers themselves, and the world has changed as a result
of them. But it does need us to educate and inform public opinion
about what the opportunities are for Parliament. I repeat, I could
not imagine a Parliament now that did not have the scale of women
representation that we have, and indeed should have more, and
equally, Parliament must have proper representation from the other
communities. If this Speaker's Conference achieves anything, it
must be to send a message to the public that a Parliament that
is not representative of all faces of the people is not one that
will command the trust and respect of the people. Therefore, we
must make these changes as parties, and if necessary, make legislative
changes to bring that about.
Chairman: Prime Minister, thank you for
your time and your evidence, we are extremely grateful to you.
1 Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation),
Interim Report, HC 167-I, 15 July 2009 Back
|