Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

Questions

Asked by Baroness Neville-Jones

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): The commencement order under the Identity Cards Act 2006 that came into force on 20 October allows for certain IPS and Home Office staff as well as airport operator staff at

3 Dec 2009 : Column WA72

Manchester and London City airports to be among the first to apply for identity cards. The information held on the National Identity Register does not include the basis of an individual's eligibility to apply for an identity card.

Since 20 October, up to and including 27 November, 1,416 eligible volunteers, from the Greater Manchester area, London and the two airports, have made an appointment to enrol for an identity card. Up to and including 20 November, almost 13,000 people have registered their interest in the National Identity Service. So far 19 per cent of those registered are from the Greater Manchester area.

We began enrolling those who live and work in Greater Manchester from 30 November. At this stage it is, therefore, difficult to make any precise forecast of the number of people likely to take up the option of applying for an identity card in the next 12 months.

Immigration

Questions

Asked by Baroness Warsi

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): Since the phasing out of embarkation controls in 1994, no Government have been able to produce an accurate figure for the number of people who are in the country illegally. By its very nature it is impossible to quantify accurately and that remains the case. However, the Government have reintroduced border controls through the e-borders system, which will, in future, allow an estimate to be made.

Asked by Baroness Warsi

Lord West of Spithead: In 2006, a total of nine contract cleaners, working in the then Immigration and Nationality Department of the Home Office, were found not to have valid leave to remain in the UK. Following that, the Home Office's procedures for checking its own employees were tightened and the Home Office worked with its contractors to ensure that they fulfilled their responsibilities for pre-employment checking of their employees. Since 2006 we know of only one other case (in 2008) where an employee of a contractor had invalid leave to remain.

Asked by Baroness Warsi



3 Dec 2009 : Column WA73

Lord West of Spithead: There have been two occasions within the last five years where compliance checks have found illegal immigrants working for Home Office contractors. In the first case (2007) the individual was removed from the UK; in the second (2009) removal action is currently under consideration.

Immigration: Detention Centres

Question

Asked by Lord Avebury

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): Each immigration removal centre (IRC) has a security department responsible for identifying threats, including drugs, and for developing strategies, responses and actions to counter these and to manage the risk.

For security reasons, we are unable to reveal the detail of the strategies. However, they are designed to minimise illegal entry to the centre of prohibited items including drugs and alcohol.

All removal centres are adequately staffed to provide a safe and secure environment for staff, detainees and visitors alike. Detention custody officers are all trained in searching techniques and substance awareness. All drug finds and incidents of trafficking are reported to the police and, where appropriate, detainee visits are monitored or visitors banned.

Immigration: Northern Ireland

Question

Asked by Lord Laird

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): There are currently no arrangements in place for those persons holding leave to enter the United Kingdom, who cross the land border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, to have a UK arrival endorsement placed in their passport. This is because the principles of the common travel area mean that such an endorsement is not required.



3 Dec 2009 : Column WA74

When applying for indefinite leave to remain, a person is asked on the application form to supply all passports and travel documents used since their first arrival in the UK. However, the accompanying guidance notes make it clear that where this evidence is not available, the applicant should provide an explanation and supply additional documentary evidence of having lived in the UK during the qualifying period.

Migration

Question

Asked by Lord Roberts of Llandudno

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): As all EEA nationals have a right to freedom of movement in the United Kingdom they are not subject to the same border controls as non-EEA nationals seeking to enter the United Kingdom.

As such no information is given to EEA nationals on their arrival.

The United Kingdom Border Agency offers relevant information on the Home Office website for EEA Nationals, and ukvisas.gov.uk offers information in the form of leaflet INF18, for EEA nationals intending to travel to the UK.

National DNA Database

Question

Asked by Lord Lester of Herne Hill

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): The National DNA Database (NDNAD) does not hold self-reported ethnicity data, but data on the "ethnic appearance" of persons who have a DNA profile on the database. The ethnic appearance data have six broad ethnic categories plus "unknown". It is based on the judgment of the police officer taking the sample and is recorded for police intelligence purposes to assist in subsequent identification. The ethnic appearance data have only been recorded for volunteer samples since 2005.

The table below shows the number of DNA profiles on the NDNAD broken down by ethnic appearance, as at 16 October 2009. "Unknown" means that no ethnic appearance was recorded by the officer taking the sample. The number of profiles held is not the same as the number of individuals. This is because some profiles are replicates-i.e. more than one profile is held for one individual. This may occur if, for example, an individual gives different names, or different

3 Dec 2009 : Column WA75

versions of their name, on separate arrests. It is estimated that 13.8 per cent of the subject profiles held on the entire NDNAD are replicates.

Data on the number of subject profiles retained on the NDNAD broken down by ethnic appearance are published in the NDNAD Annual Reports. The latest annual report for 2007-09 is published on the NPIA website at: http://www.npia.police.uk/en/14399.htm

Northern Ireland Office: Political Directorate

Question

Asked by Lord Laird

The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Baroness Royall of Blaisdon): None.

Planning

Questions

Asked by Lord Clement-Jones

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Communities and Local Government & Department for Work and Pensions (Lord McKenzie of Luton): The Government are preparing a new planning policy statement (PPS) on the historic environment. The draft PPS, which was the subject of a recent public consultation, advises that, where an element of a conservation area does not positively contribute to its significance, local planning authorities should take into account the desirability of enhancing or better revealing the significance of the conservation area. The Government believe that this could go some way towards addressing the implications of the South Lakeland judgment. We hope to publish a final version of the PPS in spring 2010.

In the 2007 White Paper, Heritage Protection for the 21st Century, the Government proposed that planning permission should be required for the partial demolition of an unlisted building in a conservation area. The intention was to address the 1997 Shimizu judgment that consent from the local planning authority is required only for total or substantial demolition. Responses to

3 Dec 2009 : Column WA76

consultation on the White Paper showed that there was general support for this measure, implementation of which would involve an amendment to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995. The timing of any such changes will be considered alongside other priorities.

Asked by Lord Tope

Lord McKenzie of Luton: A draft planning policy statement (PPS) 15 was the subject of a recent public consultation exercise. It is intended that this will replace the current planning policy guidance notes 15 (planning and the historic environment) and 16 (archaeology and planning). The draft sets out policies on the conservation of the historic environment, including designated heritage assets such as listed buildings, through the planning system. Responses to the consultation exercise are being considered and a final version of the PPS is expected to be published next spring.

Public Bodies

Questions

Asked by Lord Selsdon

Baroness Crawley: The term "non-departmental public body" has been used by successive Governments since 1980 to describe bodies which have a role in the processes of national government but are not government departments, or part of one, and which accordingly operate, to a greater or lesser extent, at arm's length from Ministers. The term "quango" is not an official term or classification used by government.

Asked by Lord Selsdon

Baroness Crawley: Information on total expenditure by non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) is published in the annual Cabinet Office Public Bodies report. Copies of Public Bodies for the period 2004-08 are available from the Libraries of the House. Copies can also be downloaded from www.civilservice.gov.uk/about/resources/ndpbs.aspx

Public Bodies 2009 will be published early in the new year. Information on budgets for NDPBs for 2009-10 is not held centrally.



3 Dec 2009 : Column WA77

Asked by Lord Selsdon

Baroness Crawley: I wrote to the noble Lord on this issue on 19 November.

Questions for Written Answer

Question

Asked by Lord Bates

The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Baroness Royall of Blaisdon): Six Questions for Written Answer tabled in the House of Lords in Session 2008-09 did not receive an Answer by the end of the Session. Departments have been advised to provide substantive Answers to these questions in writing in due course.

Visas

Questions

Asked by Baroness Warsi

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): In general terms a student whose visa is revoked has three options: they can appeal against the decision to revoke their visa to the independent Asylum and Immigration Tribunal; they can seek to regularise their stay in the United Kingdom by applying for leave to remain in another immigration category; or they can return home. Students who do not follow one of these courses of action will be considered for appropriate enforcement action. Action to enforce a person's departure is prioritised on those who pose the greatest risk to the UK public.

Asked by Lord Laird



3 Dec 2009 : Column WA78

Lord West of Spithead: The UK Border Agency has contracts in place with two suppliers to provide visa application support services throughout its global network. VFS Global operates in 34 countries, CSC (Computer Sciences Corporation) operates in 14. The countries in which they operate are listed below:

Countries in which VFS Global and CSC operate the UK's visa application support services
VFSCSC

Bahrain

Algeria

Bangladesh

Brazil

China

Canada

Ethiopia

Egypt

Ghana

France

India

Germany

Indonesia

Italy

Japan

Jamaica

Kazakhstan

Jordan

Kenya

Lebanon

Kuwait

Libya

Malawi

Serbia

Malaysia

Switzerland

Mozambique

Turkey

Namibia

Nepal

Nigeria

Oman

Pakistan

Philippines

Qatar

Russia

Singapore

Saudi Arabia

South Africa

South Korea

Sri Lanka

Syria

Taiwan

Thailand

UAE

Uganda

Ukraine

Zimbabwe

Asked by Lord Laird

Lord West of Spithead: All decisions on UK visa applications, including those lodged in India and Pakistan, are made by UK Border Agency (UKBA) entry clearance officers. VFS Global is contracted by the UKBA to provide visa application support services in India, Pakistan and various other countries and plays no part in decision making. VFS Global has no power to refuse to accept an application after due payment is made. It may inform an applicant if certain key documents appear to be missing, and that the application may be refused for that reason.


Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page