Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

Committee on Radioactive Waste Management

Lord Jenkin of Roding asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: Dr Baverstock's appointment to the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management was terminated on 19 April 2005 in line with the outcome of the independent inquiry into his position on the committee.

Single Farm Payment Scheme: Motor Sports

Earl Attlee asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: Land used in support of claims for payment under the 2005 single payment scheme (SPS) must be at claimants' disposal for the 10-month period nominated on their claim forms. Under recently updated guidance issued by the department, motor sports may take place on up to 28 days during the nominated 10-month period, in addition to all of the remaining two months. of the year. It remains the case that all claims for payment are subject to observance of set cross-compliance conditions, which apply for the whole calendar year. The updated guidance takes on board representations made by motor sports interests and, overall, we would expect the impact of the SPS on the availability of farmland used for such sports to be limited.

Scrapie

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: Commission Regulation 1492/2004 amending Regulation (EC) No. 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council obliges the UK and other member states in cases where scrapie is suspected in an ovine or caprine animal at a holding, to place all other ovine and caprine animals from that holding under official movement restriction pending
 
8 Jun 2005 : Column WA85
 
confirmation or otherwise of the suspect case. Powers in the TSE (England) Regulations 2002, as amended—in particular, Regulation 80—are relied on to apply these measures. Devolved administrations rely on similar statutory powers.

Defra: Domestic Horticulture

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: Defra did not have a stand at this year's Chelsea Flower Show but it helped to sponsor the exhibit of the Eden Project and the Institute of Horticulture, which estimates that about three-quarters of the produce displayed there was grown in the UK.

Horse Manure

Baroness Byford asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: Analysis of the Environment Agency's national enforcement database shows that there has been one pollution incident directly attributable to horse manure in the past three years.

Contrary to some press coverage, the recent changes made in the Waste Management Licensing (England and Wales) (Amendment and Related Provisions) Regulations 2005 apply only to the compositing of waste. The regulations do not apply to the storage of manure. All individuals and most liveries, stables and other establishments that keep horses will not be subject to the recent changes. No one is required to apply for a waste management licence or to register a licence exemption simply to store manure on the site where it was produced.

Oil Storage Tanks

Lord Vinson asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: This information is not collected centrally, but the latest available figures indicate that there are approximately 1 million oil storage tanks for domestic use (a) (source: ODPM Building Regulations, Regulatory Impact Assessment: October 2001,
 
8 Jun 2005 : Column WA86
 
Section 3, Part J, "Combustion Appliances and Fuel Storage Systems") and more than 580, 000 tanks for commercial use (b). (The figures for commercial use in England, Scotland and Wales relate to 1998 and were included in the regulatory impact assessments on the oil storage regulations).

Lord Vinson asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord Bach: The following table produced by the Environment Agency shows incidents of pollution to water by oils and fuels by premises type in England and Wales for 2001–04. It is not possible to provide this breakdown for 2000 and before, and "leakage" and "spillage" incidents are not recorded separately. However, overall figures for all oil pollution incidents (including category 4) are available for earlier years and show a significant decline in the five-year period 2000–04 from 6,215 to 4,306.

Incidents in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 where pollutant is oils and fuels by premise type.
Incidents that had an impact on water (either Category 1, 2 or 3):


Premises TypeTotal Incidents 2001 Total Incidents 2002 Total Incidents 2003Total Incidents 2004
Agriculture81141107103
Domestic and Residential184311231225
Manufacturing125180138142
Other Source104136120107
Power Generation and Supply18352122
Premises Type not identified48533021
Public Administration15212432
Retail Sector78888076
Service Sector107170123107
Transport343467371298
Waste Management18433852
Water Industry36496358
Total1,1571,6941,3461,243



Category 1 incidents to Water


Premises TypeTotal Incidents 2001Total Incidents 2002Total Incidents 2003Total Incidents 2004
Agriculture0200
Domestic and Residential0231
Manufacturing0146
Other Source0101
Power Generation and Supply0010
Not identified1000
Public Administration0100
Retail sector2021
Service Sector0410
Transport0233
Waste Management1000
Water Industry0142
Total4141814


 
8 Jun 2005 : Column WA87
 


Category 2 incidents to Water


Premises TypeTotal Incidents 2001Total Incidents 2002Total Incidents 2003Total Incidents 2004
Agriculture99811
Domestic and Residential1591110
Manufacturing1214722
Other Source51065
Power Generation and Supply0214
Not identified2001
Public Administration4262
Retail Sector9375
Service Sector11191312
Transport18161613
Waste Management0434
Water Industry0523
Total85938092
Number of incidents where premises not known1,4891,879
Cat 1 =5, Cat 2 =401,743
Cat 1 = 3,
Cat 2 = 411,589
Cat 1 = 4
Cat 2 = 28




Key


Category 1—the most severe


Category 2—significant, but less severe


Category 3—relatively minor


Category 4—no impact on the water environment







Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page