| Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Rogan: My Lords, I am far from content but there will be an opportunity to test the opinion of the House on this wide-ranging debate on Amendment No. 86. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendments Nos. 83 to 85 not moved.]
Lord Glentoran moved Amendment No. 86:
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 86) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 88; Not-Contents, 145.
Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.
6.8 p.m.
Clause 67 [Information about discharge and temporary release of prisoners]:
Baroness Park of Monmouth moved Amendment No. 86A:
The noble Baroness said: My Lords, I hope to persuade the Government to make specific provision for the right of members of the community who have lost friends or family because of the terrorist activities of those persons known as "on the runs" to be informed in advance of those persons' impending return to the community.
The Prime Minister and the Taoiseach agreed with Sinn Fein at the Weston Park talks in July to do something to enable such fugitives, who have never been brought to justice, to return to their communities. The Prime Minister has recently given assurances that there was no offer of amnesty nor was one asked for. The Prime Minister nevertheless considers himself committed to finding a solution.
The OTRs include those who have planted the Enniskillen bomb. Their identities and the crimes for which they were responsible are already well known to the community, and the fact that they have fled and never dared to return suggests at least a recognition of guilt.
Since the intention to allow them to return became known, there has been widespread grief and rage in both the Unionist and the republican communities. That grief and rage are all the greater since there are no plans for the return of the many families exiled to the mainland under threat of death if they return. They are exiles solely because they displeased the violent and armed paramilitaries who still rule the streets in Belfast, four years after the Belfast agreement. These victims dare not testify against their oppressors and the police cannot act. So the innocent must remain exiles, while the OTRs, each with a record of crime, violence and murder, are to return and be welcomed home by their paramilitary community.
That is why I have tabled this amendment. I believe that the victims of the OTRs are entitled to be consulted and warned. The Government may well say that of course the scheme will cover them. Without explicit provision on the face of the Bill of the kind that I have proposed, it will not.
First, the present scheme refers to released prisoners. We still do not know whether the OTRs are to serve any prison term. Secondly, the existing early release information scheme states that the scheme does not apply to,
We do not know what formula will be invoked to fulfil the commitment made by the Prime Minister and the Taoiseach that they would,
The Government have argued that,
I believe that we owe it to the victims of the OTRs to ensure on the face of the Bill that their rights are expressly preserved. I have considerable faith that the noble and learned Lord will recognise the justice and the timeliness of this amendment. I beg to move.
"( ) A victim information scheme must also apply in respect of persons in the category of OTRs ("on the runs") who, after due process, may be released into the community."
"a person convicted who may not have served a prison sentence",
or,
"a prisoner who has not received a sentence of five years or more".
Finally, the scheme lays down that,
"for the protection of some of the individuals involved, specific information may not be provided".
"take such steps as are necessary in their jurisdiction to resolve the difficulty so that those concerned are no longer pursued"
although I welcome the Prime Minister's intention, as I understand it, to bring those proposals to Parliament.
"Such people would, if convicted, stand to benefit by early release",
and,
"it would be a natural development of the scheme for such prosecutions not to be pursued".
On all those counts, it seems certain that under the provisions of the present early release scheme which I have cited, and perhaps particularly under the provision for,
"the protection of the individuals involved",
the victims of the crimes of the OTRs would not be entitled at present to have advance warning of their triumphant reappearance on the streets where their victims live.
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page