Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

Lord Clement-Jones: My Lords, the Minister has described the process, but clearly it will be three years in the making. As the noble Lord, Lord Walton, has described, these drugs are widely available in other countries. Every minute matters for MS patients. Can the Minister affirm that the current determination has nothing whatever to do with the Government's concerns about the affordability of such drugs?

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My Lords, absolutely. This is a matter entirely for NICE. At various stages the Government have been asked to provide evidence to NICE, but the decisions about the appraisal system and the decision of the appeal committee have nothing to do with the Government.

Earl Howe: My Lords, does the Minister accept that one of the main criticisms of the NICE process is that, while it is under way, effectively it imposes a blight on the treatment concerned, in the sense that health authorities are unwilling to authorise prescriptions for new patients? In the context of MS treatments which are now blighted in that way, will the Minister and his colleagues give serious consideration, pending the NICE judgment, to re-issuing the department's executive letter 95/97 which required health authorities to make drug treatments available to MS patients who need them?

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: My Lords, the document is in circulation in the health service and the prescribing of beta interferon should continue in line with what is stated in it. Perhaps I may remind the noble Earl that NICE was set up because of the inheritance of widely differing prescribing regimes--postcode prescribing--and inconsistency. NICE provides greater consistency and enables the faster take-up of drugs and new technologies when they have been proven to be effective. As a result of judgments made by NICE, many millions of pounds of additional expenditure has been committed to the NHS for that purpose.

Foot and Mouth Disease: Compensation

3.1 p.m.

Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer asked Her Majesty's Government:

Baroness Hayman: My Lords, the Government pay compensation on all animals slaughtered in order to control and eradicate foot and mouth disease. It is the

7 Mar 2001 : Column 205

long-standing policy of successive governments not to offer compensation for consequential losses associated with animal disease outbreaks.

In recognition of the effects on the livestock industry of the current outbreak of FMD, last week the Government announced £156 million in agrimonetary compensation for dairy, beef and sheep farmers and are bringing forward £20 million from the financial year 2002-03 for the pig industry restructuring scheme, giving a total of £43 million for pig farmers. The Government will of course keep the situation under review.

Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer: My Lords, does the Minister accept that, unless the compensation scheme is widened, the fundamental review of agriculture which was promised by the Prime Minister last week will not be able to take effect? There will be a huge exodus of small family livestock farmers and hauliers and more small abattoirs will go out of business because their incomes have substantially decreased, in some cases to nothing, while their costs have substantially increased.

Does the Minister also accept that the next few months will be critical? While the agrimonetary compensation is welcome, it was due in any event for other reasons. Does the Minister agree that widening the scheme is essential?

Baroness Hayman: My Lords, the noble Baroness rightly points out that the agrimonetary compensation is not specifically for those who have suffered loss as a consequence of FMD. When one calculates the amount of consequential loss and the sectors into which it is has gone, one can see that it is enormous and almost limitless. We have already seen a wide range of claims for compensation from those involved in, for example, tourism and sports fixtures in addition to those involved in farming, abattoirs and the retail industry, which might not be popular with many Members of your Lordships' House.

The most important steps we can take are to make maximum use of the available non-state-aid mechanisms--and we have done that for the pig sector and through agrimonetary compensation; to get the disease under control; and to return working in the livestock industry to normal operation.

Lord Soulsby of Swaffham Prior: My Lords, I want to address an area in which the livestock industry of this country is world famous; namely, the export of pedigree animals throughout the world. Although it is helpful that the immediate value of such animals is of concern to livestock farmers, it takes many years to build up the pedigree flocks and herds and it takes many years to replace them. Do the Government have plans to help those involved in pedigree livestock to rebuild if their stocks are decimated by FMD; for example, by offering long-term loans at low interest rates?

7 Mar 2001 : Column 206

Baroness Hayman: My Lords, I understand the financial and emotional consequences of losing specialist herds which have taken people years and generations to build up. I said in my original Answer that we would keep the situation under review and of course specific cases will be made for specific areas of compensation, as the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, pointed out. However, it would be wrong to hold out hope that there will be across-the-board compensation for every kind of consequential loss arising from these circumstances.

Baroness Masham of Ilton: My Lords, is the Minister aware that the signs erected by MAFF closing public rights of way and fields in which sheep and cattle are grazing are being pulled down by the public? Will she try to educate them through television and radio programmes?

Baroness Hayman: My Lords, from the beginning of the outbreak, Ministers, vets and those in local authorities responsible for the closures of rights of way have urged the public, most of whom have behaved responsibly, to avoid contact with livestock and any possible spreading of the disease. Occasionally, individuals behave irresponsibly. We can provide a great deal of education, but in some cases it will be necessary to prosecute.

Baroness Billingham: My Lords, is the Minister aware that, following this appalling epidemic, the one positive outcome has been the outstanding way in which the relevant agencies have co-operated? I refer to MAFF, the NFU, veterinary services and people from abroad who have come to lend their support. It has been an appalling situation but people have dealt with it in the best possible way.

Baroness Hayman: My Lords, I agree that the vast majority or organisations and individuals have behaved in a highly responsible fashion. I add my tribute in particular to the Chief Veterinary Officer and his staff, who have behaved with the utmost professionalism. Last week we cancelled all leave for the state veterinary service, which was not necessary--we did not have to make them come in because it was difficult to stop them coming in.

Business of the House: Debates this Day

3.8 p.m.

The Lord Privy Seal (Baroness Jay of Paddington): My Lords, I beg to move the Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.

Moved, That the debate on the Motion in the name of the Lord Tanlaw set down for today shall be limited to one-and-a-half hours and that in the name of the Lord St John of Bletso to three-and-a-half hours.--(Baroness Jay of Paddington.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

7 Mar 2001 : Column 207

Economic Affairs: Select Committee

The Principal Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Tordoff): My Lords, I beg to move the first Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.

Moved, That a Select Committee be appointed to consider economic affairs;

That, as proposed by the Committee of Selection, the following Lords be named of the committee:

L. Barnett, L. Burns, L. Cuckney, L. Elder, B. Hogg, L. Newby, L. Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay, B. O'Cathain, L. Paul, L. Peston (Chairman), L. Roll of Ipsden, L. Vinson;

That the committee have power to appoint specialist advisers;

That the committee have power to adjourn from place to place;

That the committee have leave to report from time to time.--(Lord Tordoff.)

On Question, Motion agreed to.

Stem Cell Research: Select Committee

3.9 p.m.

Lord Tordoff: My Lords, I beg to move the second Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper.

Moved, That a Select Committee be appointed to consider and report on the issues connected with human cloning and stem cell research arising from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2000;

That, as proposed by the Committee of Selection, the following Lords be named of the committee:

E. Carnarvon, B. Cumberlege, L. Dahrendorf, L. Donoughue, B. McIntosh of Hudnall, B. Northover, B. O'Neill of Bengarve, Bp. Oxford (Chairman), B. Perry of Southwark, B. Platt of Writtle, B. Warwick of Undercliffe;

That the committee have power to appoint specialist advisers;

That the committee have power to adjourn from place to place.--(Lord Tordoff.)

Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page