| Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
Lord Whitty moved Amendment No. 264:
[Amendment No. 264A, as an amendment to Amendment No. 264, not moved.]
On Question, Amendment No. 264 agreed to.
Clause 66, as amended, agreed to.
[Amendments Nos. 265 and 265A not moved.]
Clause 34 [Principles governing conduct of members of relevant authorities]:
Lord Whitty moved Amendments Nos. 266 to 268:
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Clause 34, as amended, agreed to.
Clause 35 [Model code of conduct]:
Lord Whitty moved Amendments Nos. 269 to 271:
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Clause 35, as amended, agreed to.
Clause 36 [Duty of relevant authorities to adopt codes of conduct]:
Lord Whitty moved Amendments Nos. 272 and 273:
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Baroness Hamwee moved Amendment No. 273A:
The noble Baroness said: Amendment No. 273A seeks clarification of what is a "newspaper" for the purposes of Clause 36(5). The provision requires a local authority, after adopting or revising a code of conduct, to publish certain matters in a newspaper circulating in its area. My amendment proposes that such a newspaper may include or may be a newspaper published by the authority. In raising this point I am aware of the issues concerning what is proper publication of indicators and reaching performance indicators where local authorities are required to publish details of how they have met certain targets.
It may well be that a local authority newspaper which is delivered free to every household will have a better circulation than a commercial newspaper. In moving the amendment I seek to learn the Government's intention in this matter. I hope that they will feel able, if not to accept the wording, at least to accept the spirit of this amendment. I beg to move.
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton: As the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, said, adoption of the amendment would mean the Bill being amended in order that information regarding the adoption of a code of conduct would be published in a newspaper published by the authority alone. While we would certainly encourage local authorities to circulate their code of conduct through their own publications--the Bill as drafted would not prevent that--we are wary of including an amendment that could reduce the requirement for publication of information on the adoption of a code of conduct solely to a newspaper published by the authority. I can see a position arising where an authority may be tempted to publish even though the circulation of the newspaper is based on membership of the electoral roll. That can exclude people who are new to the area and people working in the area and can be limiting.
I should remind the noble Baroness that we are not asking for a large item to be published in a newspaper. We are asking only that information about the code being adopted and where it can be seen is published. In the light of that and the reassurance that there is no need for a specific amendment which requires a local authority to publish information about the availability of the code in one of its own newspapers as well, I hope that the noble Baroness will feel able to withdraw her amendment.
Baroness Hamwee: I take the point that one has to be careful about using an authority's own publication, but it seems to me that it is doing no more than meeting a bit of fine print to have a small advertisement in a commercial newspaper which is unlikely to be read by anyone other than its most devoted reader. It might be more effective to have the information published in an authority's own newspaper.
As I was speaking, it occurred to me that there might be a mechanism allowing the standards board to assess the means of publication proposed by an authority. It
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Lord Whitty moved Amendment No. 274:
Page 17, line 14, after ("members") insert ("and co-opted members").
Page 17, line 16, after ("members") insert ("and co-opted members").
Page 18, line 6, at end insert--
("(6) In this Part "co-opted member", in relation to a relevant authority, means a person who is not a member of the authority but who--
(a) is a member of any committee or sub-committee of the authority, or
(b) is a member of, and represents the authority on, any joint committee or joint sub-committee of the authority,
and who is entitled to vote on any question which falls to be decided at any meeting of that committee or sub-committee.").
Page 18, line 8, after ("members") insert ("and co-opted members").
Page 18, line 11, after ("members") insert ("and co-opted members").
Page 18, line 36, after ("concerned") insert ("or the Partnership Council (as the case may be)").
Page 18, line 44, after ("members") insert ("and co-opted members").
Page 19, line 16, after ("members") insert ("and co-opted members").
Page 19, line 23, after ("newspapers") insert (", which may be or include a newspaper published by the authority,").
10.45 p.m.
Page 19, line 29, at end insert--
Next Section
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page