House of Lords - Minute
        
House of Lords
Session 1998-99
Publications on the internet
Minutes and Order Papers

Minutes and Order Paper - Minutes of Proceedings


 

HOUSE OF LORDS

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

Die Lunae 18° Januarii 1999

The House met at half-past two o’clock.

PRAYERS were read by the Lord Bishop of Chichester.

Judicial Business

1. Harris (Respondent) v. Scholfield Roberts & Hill (a firm) (Petitioners) and others (lodged 11th January)— The petition of Scholfield Roberts & Hill praying for leave to appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.

2. Housing Loan Corporation plc (in Administrative Receivership (Petitioners) v. William H Brown Limited and others (Respondents)— The petition of the Housing Loan Corporation (in Administrative Receivership) praying for leave to appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.

3. Birmingham City Council (Petitioners) v. Oakley (Respondent) (lodged 15th January)— The petition of Birmingham City Council praying for leave to appeal in accordance with the Administration of Justice Act 1960 was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.

4. In re J (a minor) (A.P.) (Respondent)— The petition of the appellant praying that the appeal be withdrawn on the terms agreed between the parties and on condition that the appellant do pay to the respondents any costs incurred in respect of the petition of appeal to this House, such costs to be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties (the agents for the respondents consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.

5. Regina v. Martin (Petitioner)— Upon application by the petitioner (the agents for the respondents consenting thereto), it was ordered that the petition be withdrawn.

6. Vehicle Inspectorate (Respondents) v. Bruce Cook Road Planing Limited and another (Appellants) (On Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division)— The appeal was set down for hearing and referred to an Appellate Committee.

7. Appeal Committee—The 15th Report from the Appeal Committee was agreed to and the following Orders were made:

    Senate Electrical Wholesalers Limited (Petitioners) v. STC Submarine Systems Limited (Respondents) and another—That the respondents be invited to lodge objections by 1st February next.

    Bennett (Respondent) v. News Group Newspapers Limited (Petitioners)— That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondent be at liberty to apply for his costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d) and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.

    Mond (In his capacity as Trustee of the property of David Philip Hood (a bankrupt) and in his personal capacity) (Petitioner) v. Hyde (Assistant Official Receiver) and others (Respondents)— That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d) and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.

    Nairne (A.P.) (Petitioner) v. London Borough of Camden (Respondents)— That leave to appeal be refused; that the costs of the petitioner be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Act 1988; and that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(c) and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.

    Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) ex parte Kabba (A.P.) (Petitioner)— That leave to appeal be refused; that the costs of the petitioner be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Act 1988.

    Regina v. Cambridge City Council (Respondents) ex parte Lane (A.P.) (Petitioner)— That leave to appeal be refused; that the costs of the petitioner be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Act 1988; that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(c) and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.

8. Appeal Committee—The 16th Report from the Appeal Committee was agreed to and the following Orders were made:

    Owners of the Ship or Vessel ’Herceg Novi’ (Petitioners) v. Owners and/or demise charterers of the Ship or Vessel ’Ming Galaxy’ (Respondents)— That the respondents be invited to lodge objections by 1st February next.

    Morecroft Urquhart (Respondents) v. Dundon (Petitioner)— That the petition be dismissed as inadmissible.

    Regina v. Immigration Appellate Authority (Respondents) ex parte Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) and Cakabay (A.P.) (Petitioner)— That the respondent be invited to lodge objections by 1st February next.

    Evans (Petitioner) v. Motor Insurers’ Bureau (Respondents)— That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d) and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.

    C. Itoh & Co Limited and others (Respondents) and others v. Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited (Petitioners) and one other petition—That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d) and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.

    Inco Europe Limited and others (Petitioners) v. First Choice Distribution (a firm) and others (Respondents)— That the respondents be invited to lodge objections by 1st February next.

Papers

9. Statutory Instrument (Standing Order 68)— The following negative instrument, having been laid before the House on 15th January, was ordered to lie on the Table:

    European Communities (Recognition of Professional Qualifications) (Second General System) (Amendment) Regulations 1999, laid under the European Communities Act 1972.      (67)

10. Negative Instruments—The following instruments were laid before the House and ordered to lie on the Table:

    1. Draft Code of Practice on LEA-School Relations, laid under the School Standards and Framework Act 1998;      (—)

    2. Local Government Act 1988 (Defined Activities) (Exemption) (Enfield London Borough Council) Order 1998, laid under the Local Government Act 1988.      (3302)

11. Paper not subject to parliamentary proceedings—The following paper was laid before the House and ordered to lie on the Table:

    Naval and Marine Pay and Pensions (Pay and Allowances) Order 1998, laid under the Naval and Marine Pay and Pensions Act 1865.

Public Business

12. Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Bill [HL]— The House resolved itself into a Committee upon the bill; amendments were moved and (by leave of the Committee) withdrawn; the House was resumed for a statement; the House again resolved itself into a Committee upon the bill; amendments were moved and (by leave of the Committee) withdrawn; amendments were agreed to; the House was resumed after clause 13 stood part.

13. Citizenship and democracy—The Lord Phillips of Sudbury asked Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to implement the recommendations of the final report of the Crick Advisory Group on Education for Citizenship and the Teaching of Democracy in Schools; after debate, the question was answered by the Baroness Blackstone.

The House was adjourned at twenty-nine minutes before ten o’clock

till tomorrow, half-past two o’clock.

MICHAEL DAVIES

Cler: Parliamentor:

 
 
 
continue to Judicial Business
 
House of Lords home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries ordering


© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared: 19 january 1999