Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page


Lottery Fund Decisions

Lord Freyberg asked Her Majesty's Government:

Lord McIntosh of Haringey: Lottery funding decisions are made by a number of distributing bodies: the Sports and Arts Councils of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland; the National Heritage

19 Nov 1998 : Column WA202

Memorial Fund; the Millennium Commission; the National Lottery Charities Board; and the New Opportunities Fund. The bodies operate at arm's length from government. Ministers have no say in individual grant decisions.

The Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (and other ministerial colleagues, depending on the distribution body in question) set the financial management framework within which the bodies operate and the broad policy matters they are expected to take into account when reaching their decisions. In addition, the New Opportunities Fund can support only projects which fall within an initiative defined in an order made by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and approved by Parliament. We have no plans to review these arrangements.

Protection of Wrecks

Lord Onslow of Woking asked Her Majesty's Government:

    What recent representations they have received about the operation of the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973; and what steps are being taken to ensure that this legislation continues to be effectively enforced.[HL3832]

Lord McIntosh of Haringey: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State has been sent a copy by the noble Lord of a letter addressed to him from Mr. Michael Williams of the South-West Maritime Archaeological Group. Among other issues, this letter commented on the operation of the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973. The noble Lord will be receiving a reply shortly to this correspondence.

It is a criminal offence under the Protection of Wrecks Act 1973 for any person to engage in certain conduct within a designated area without a licence granted by the relevant Secretary of State. Licences are issued on the advice of the Advisory Committee on Historic Wreck Sites and will stipulate certain conditions to ensure that appropriate archaeological standards are maintained on designated sites. Although responsibility for policing or prosecuting offences under the 1973 Act lies with the relevant police force, my department does provide advice, where necessary, about the provisions of the Act. Steps are being undertaken to ensure that all police forces are aware of their responsibilities under the 1973 Act.

Braille Grant

Lord Morris of Manchester asked Her Majesty's Government:

    What the Braille grant to the Royal National Institute of the Blind, funded by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport under its Small Grants Scheme, which has been frozen at the same level since 1991 (following a cut of £50,000) would now be worth if it had been increased in line with the retail prices index; and, in view of the increased demand

19 Nov 1998 : Column WA203

    for Braille expected when Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act comes into effect, whether the grant's future is assured.[HL3809]

Lord McIntosh of Haringey: If the grant had been increased in line with the retail prices index since 1991-92, it would now have been worth £240,593. As part of the Government's Comprehensive Spending Review, my department took a strategic look at what could be done to ensure blind and visually impaired people benefit in a much wider way from public library services than they do at present. By allocating the grant to the Library and Information Commission we aim to create a fresh impetus to the provision of library services to the blind and visually impaired people and to provide the opportunity for local authorities to embed these into the mainstream library service. In reaching our conclusion we were aware that the grant supports only a small element of the spending of over £6 million that the Royal National Institute makes on embossed literature. Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act will require public libraries to make adjustments to practices, policies or procedures that make it impossible or unreasonably difficult for disabled people to make use of their services and my department was aware of this as a possible use of the grant.

Museums: Free Access Implications

Lord Freyberg asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether the grant to national museums to ensure free access to all visitors (in the third year of their access scheme) is sufficient to match the income lost by those museums through ticket sales and through their inability to recover VAT.[HL3779]

Lord McIntosh of Haringey: Initial estimates of the requirement were made by departmental officials. Further work on the detail of requisite funding allocations has been carried out in consultation with the national museums, including the issuing of detailed questionnaires in each case, and the analysis of any VAT implications that may arise.

Decisions on the adoption of the stages towards free admission remain of course with the trustees of the individual museums.

Humanitarian Projects: NGOs and the ECHO

Baroness Gardner of Parkes asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they will seek assurances from the European Commission that those non-governmental organisations which, due to revision of the European Commission's Humanitarian Office (ECHO) guidelines, have been delayed in signing Framework Partnership Agreements with the ECHO are not excluded from applying to work with the ECHO on humanitarian projects.[HL3887]

19 Nov 1998 : Column WA204

Baroness Amos: The issue of the relationship between Non-Governmental Organisations and the European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO) is being discussed at the next ECHO Humanitarian Aid Committee meeting in Brussels on 26 November, where information on the latest Framework Partnership Contract is to be presented to member state delegations. We will take the opportunity of raising the noble Baroness's point with them.

Developing Countries: EU Funding to UK NGOs

Baroness Gardner of Parkes asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Whether they will seek assurances from the European Commission that United Kingdom non-governmental organisations will not experience discriminatory delays and difficulties in accessing funding under the co-financing budget of Directorate-General VIII for projects in developing countries.[HL3886]

Baroness Amos: We are not aware of any discrimination by the European Commission against UK non-governmental organisations, but we are concerned at the delays in the Commission for approving contracts with partner organisations. We are supporting work to rationalise the Commission's aid management systems to ensure faster and more flexible procedures, while at the same time maintaining financial propriety. We oppose strongly any attempts to impose national quotas, whether formal or informal.

Young Offenders

Lord Islwyn asked Her Majesty's Government:

    When their proposals for a new disposal for young offenders, contained in Chapter 9 of the White Paper No More Excuses, will be taken forward.[HL3923]

The Minister of State, Home Office (Lord Williams of Mostyn): The White Paper No More Excuses set out radical proposals for reform of the youth court, to enable those appearing before the youth court for the first time to be referred, by way of sentence, to a youth offender panel. Following the principles of restorative justice, the panel would draw up a contract with the young offender to include reparation to the victim of the offence or to the wider community, and measures to deal with drug or alcohol abuse, poor parenting or other issues relevant to the offending behaviour. The length of the referral would be determined by the court, on the basis of the seriousness of the crime, up to a maximum of 12 months. The Government invited comments on these proposals and received replies from 97 individuals and organisations. The majority of the respondents were in favour of the proposals.

19 Nov 1998 : Column WA205

As suggested in the White Paper, it is intended that the new disposal will be automatic for those appearing for the first time and pleading guilty, save for those occasions where either an absolute discharge or a custodial sentence is considered appropriate. In the light of consultation, it is also proposed to make the disposal available, on a discretionary basis, where the defendant pleads guilty to some offences but not guilty to others; and to give the courts discretion to extend referral orders when dealing with other offences committed before or during the referral period. The White Paper suggested that membership of the youth offender panel be drawn from the magistracy and the police. In the light of consultation, it is proposed that panel members be recruited from members of the community with an experience of young people and crime. This would include magistrates and the police, but on a lay basis.

Subject to these and other minor amendments to the original White Paper proposals, legislation making provision for this new disposal will be introduced at the earliest opportunity.


Next Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page