|Previous Section||Back to Table of Contents||Lords Hansard Home Page|
Baroness Hayman: My Lords, I am interested in the comments of the noble Lord. I know that the international organisation representing the manufacturers of the gases--in this country ICI--has stated clearly that it does not consider chilled cans to be a proper use of a potentially highly dangerous gas. However, the cans were presented using the gas at a trade event in Singapore and the Joseph Company in the United States said that it was putting forward plans for them.
Lord Monkswell: My Lords, I welcome the action the Government have taken, as explained by my noble friend on the Front Bench. Can she advise the House whether representations have been made to other advanced industrial areas of the world, particularly the United States and Japan?
Baroness Hayman: Yes, my Lords. My right honourable friend Mr. Meacher has been in touch with his counterpart in the United States to express our concerns and we hope for the possibility of joint action in this area.
Baroness Sharples: My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply. Are her Majesty's Government in contact with the Swedish Government which, three years ago, abolished quarantine since when there have been no cases of rabies and no increase in bringing dogs into the country illegally? Also, can the noble Lord say how many years it is since a case of rabies occurred within the quarantine kennels?
Lord Donoughue: My Lords, we are in contact with Sweden. The year after it introduced the new system we sent officials there to see how it was working. We have remained in contact since. The Swedish system is one that we will look at closely and take into account when we come to our own conclusions. On rabies in quarantine in this country, the last probable case was in 1983 when a dog imported from the United States died. The scientist who investigated concluded that it was rabies, although only one of the three normal tests was able to be made.
Lord Strabolgi: My Lords, is my noble friend aware that conditions in some of the quarantine kennels are very much below standard and that government inspectors have apparently no right to enter them, although the RSPCA can? Are the Government doing something to improve the previous legislation?
Lord Donoughue: My Lords, it is true that the Animal Health Act 1981, which covers licensing, covers disease control and physical security but it has been our legal advice that it does not cover the welfare and physical comfort of the animals there. As a result, the department has introduced a voluntary code to apply to the kennels. Our inspectors are currently inspecting all kennels and have nearly completed that process. Where they meet the code that information is given to all people who intend to put animals into kennels.
Lord Hooson: My Lords, does the noble Lord agree that the ambit of this Question should possibly be enlarged to include not only domestic pets but all animals--farm animals, horses and so on? Does he further agree that with modern scientific developments and our increased knowledge of this disease it is quite unnecessary to have quarantine to safeguard the health of this country?
Lord Donoughue: My Lords, the noble Lord is correct. On a previous occasion an impression was conveyed that quarantine is fairly narrowly confined to pets. But those animals subject to it are carnivores, bats, rabbits, marsupials, primates and even rodents, although I believe journalists are exempt. It is believed that farm animals are not a danger because they are an end-host recipient and do not pass it on. In terms of bringing the
Lord Molloy: My Lords, what are the numbers involved? Is contact maintained with the British Veterinary Association when this problem either increases or decreases? The British Veterinary Association is surely a valuable help to the Minister and should be kept constantly informed. Will he let me have his views on that possibility?
Lord Soulsby of Swaffham Prior: My Lords, I welcome the Minister's comments that any alternative arrangements would safeguard this country against the importation of rabies. The majority of the conditions for lifting quarantine have been met--an adequate vaccination policy, identification, certification and the freedom of the European Union from dog rabies and a virtual absence of fox rabies. Can he assure the House that he will speed the consideration of lifting quarantine in view of the fact that many bodies agree that it is timely to lift the quarantine regulations and requirements?
Lord Donoughue: My Lords, the noble Lord is one of the most distinguished experts in this field. We are aware of his views. I can assure him that we shall proceed on this matter with all speed commensurate with not subjecting the United Kingdom to risk.
Lord St. John of Bletso: My Lords, is the Minister aware that the United Kingdom and Hawaii are the only two countries that retain these draconian six-month quarantine rules? Is it not the case that unless the Government take on board the recommendations of the Agriculture Select Committee of another place some two years ago there will be a heightened risk of smuggling, which could indirectly bring rabies into Britain?
Lord Donoughue: My Lords, the noble Lord is right. The danger of smuggling is one of the main factors we have under consideration. I do not share the noble Lord's knowledge of Hawaii, but if I can find a way of investigating local conditions I will.
Lord Geddes: My Lords, in his original Answer I think I heard the Minister use the word "consult" in the context of alternatives to quarantine. Can he help the House by saying what other bodies, apart from the
Earl Ferrers: My Lords, can the noble Lord give an assurance that he and the Government will not be trammelled too far into giving up quarantine for rabies? Does he agree that rabies in human beings is a most terrible disease? Whenever the matter has been considered in the past it has always been thought prudent to retain our quarantine arrangements. Will he therefore not get rid of the quarantine arrangements without ensuring that any substitute is just as good?
Lord Berkeley: My Lords, while I agree that my noble friend should take into consideration the comments of the noble Earl, Lord Ferrers, is he aware that only four human beings have died in western Europe since the last war from rabies contracted in western Europe? Will he take into consideration not only the effect it has on human beings but also the effects on dogs and other animals of being incarcerated for six months?
Lord Donoughue: My Lords, I am aware of those figures. That is one of the reasons why we are actively reconsidering the position. No doubt the noble Earl, Lord Ferrers, would say that one of the reasons why the figures in this country are so good is that we have the present controls.
Baroness Sharples: My Lords, is it not true that people who might contract rabies do not have to have the awful injections in the stomach which used to be given in the past but in fact have three injections in the shoulder and that they suffer no ill effects?
Lord Lucas: My Lords, will the noble Lord accept my congratulations on his first Answer to my noble friend Lady Sharples? It seemed enormously helpful but gave no commitments whatever on the actual timescale of the process. Does he accept that we share the concern that this matter should be addressed speedily? Whatever the conclusion may be, there is no longer any excuse for delay. The noble Lord should be able to give us a greater commitment as to when the White Paper or the discussion paper will be produced and when he would anticipate we might expect legislation if that is to be the case.
Back to Table of Contents
Lords Hansard Home Page