| Previous Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |
The Earl of Northesk asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Baroness Chalker of Wallasey): I am pleased to advise that I have this month approved a £26 million development commitment to St. Helena covering the next three years. This significant allocation, which represents an increase over previous plans, is linked to an agreement between the St. Helena Government and HMG on a three year Country Policy Plan (CPP). This provides a detailed framework for the reform and development of the island's economy. It illustrates the Government's continuing commitment to ensuring economic development and proper governance of the UK dependent territories as a whole.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: The statement to which the noble Lord refers was agreed by NATO Foreign and Defence Ministers and is a firm political declaration on deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory of any new member state. It is compatible with our obligations under Article 5 of the Washington treaty.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: NATO has not set equipment requirements in the context of enlargement. It is for the countries concerned to decide what equipment their armed forces need.
Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: "To atone" could otherwise be expressed as "to make amends for". The relevant Security Council resolutions require Iraq to compensate the victims of its occupation of Kuwait, to return stolen property, and to account for the whereabouts of those missing since the occupation.
Lord Judd asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: Consistent with the Overseas Development and Co-operation Act 1980, the primary purpose of all development assistance budget spending is developmental. All projects must pass the usual tests of developmental soundness. Arms deals never have any connection, direct or indirect, with the provision of British development assistance.
Lord Judd asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: We are ready to assist the UN in reforming the International Criminal Tribunal. We welcome Secretary-General Annan's announcement that he will pursue this urgently, in the light of the report by the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services, and we expect rapid follow-up action.
Lord Judd asked Her Majesty's Government:
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey: We fully support the UN/OAU Special Envoy to the Great Lakes region, Mohamed Sahnoun, in his efforts, co-ordinated with regional leaders, to prepare for and convene an international conference under UN/OAU auspices. We therefore welcome UN Security Council Resolution 1097, adopted on 18 February, endorsing Mr. Sahnoun's five-point peace plan, which includes the convening of an international conference.
The Earl of Stockton asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Home Office (Baroness Blatch): The noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, has produced a thoughtful and comprehensive set of recommendations for new, permanent counter-terrorism legislation covering the whole of the United Kingdom in the event of a lasting peace being established in Northern Ireland. My right honourable friend and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland are grateful for this work; but in the continuing absence of a lasting peace they believe that it is too early to reach a firm view on possible fundamental legislative change. They hope that there will soon be a permanent cessation of violence which would enable us to look again at the possibility of providing a new legislative framework for combatting terrorism.
The Government do however intend to bring forward in due course proposals to strengthen existing controls on terrorist finances, along the lines of Lord Lloyd's very helpful analysis. These proposals will include extending existing controls more widely to international terrorism.
Lord Moran asked Her Majesty's Government:
The Minister of State, Department of the Environment (Earl Ferrers): A formal public consultation on the Joint Nature Conservation Committee's recommendation, part of their third Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, began on 29 January 1997 and is due to end on 1 April 1997. It will not be possible to make a final decision about the recommendation until full consideration of responses to the consultation exercise has taken place. However, should the basking shark be listed, it is understood there will be no need to amend or replace the EU/Norway agreement. The arrangement applies to member state waters outside territorial waters, whilst the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 only applies to those territorial waters.
Baroness Rawlings asked Her Majesty's Government:
Earl Ferrers: The financial management and policy review of English Nature has been completed. The intention of the review was to see whether English Nature's systems of internal control over both administrative and programme expenditure were reliable and effective. Today the report was presented to my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for the Environment and to the chairman of English Nature, and I have arranged for copies of the report to be placed in the Library of the House.
The review by my department has made more than 50 recommendations. As a result of the review there will be a major change in the relationship between the department and English Nature which will include the introduction of single running cost control, a revised financial memorandum, and a management statement.
Single running cost control is an annual cash limit for a non-departmental public body running costs which replaces more detailed item by item scrutiny. It enables a non-departmental public body to manage its own administration expenditure within that limit, subject to such overall constraints as government policy on pay. The establishment of single running cost control emphasises that primary responsibility for both financial control and value for money rests with the non-departmental public body's own management.
For a non-departmental public body to be able to follow such an approach requires the support, encouragement and co-operation of its sponsoring department. English Nature and the department will work together to achieve this aim.
I consider that all of the recommendations are important. Together, they constitute a package which will enable English Nature to continue to ensure that it is operating in an efficient and effective manner.
| Next Section | Back to Table of Contents | Lords Hansard Home Page |