Previous Section Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page

MoD Contracts: Invitations to Tender

Lord Kennet asked Her Majesty's Government:

8 Jul 1996 : Column WA5

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Defence (Earl Howe): Invitations to tender have been issued to a range of British and overseas companies for five defence equipment contracts expected to be worth substantially in excess of £500 million. These equipments are as follows, with companies invited to tender shown in brackets and prime contractor nationality indicated in italics in each case:

1. Replacement maritime patrol aircraft (BAc)(UK); Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems (US); Lockheed Martin Tactical Systems UK (US); Dassault Aviation (French)).

2. Conventionally armed stand-off missile (BAc) (UK); CEC Marconi (UK); Hughes Missiles (US); Texas Instruments (US); McDonnell Douglas (US); Taurus (DASA/Bofors) (German/Swedish); Rafael (Israeli));

3. Advanced air launched anti-armour weapon (BAe) (UK); GEC Marconi (UK); Hunting Engineering Ltd. (UK); Texas Instruments (US); Thomson Thorn Missiles Electronics (French)).

4. Future medium range air-to-air missile (BAe) (UK); Hughes Missiles (US)

5. Trafalgar Class submarines (Batch 2) (GEC Marine (UK))

The Government do not retain records of former Ministry of Defence civil servants or former military personnel currently employed by defence contractors.

Ministers' Political Advisers

Lord Harris of Greenwich asked Her Majesty's Government:

    Which Ministers have political advisers.

The Lord Privy Seal (Viscount Cranborne): As at 1st July, the following Ministers had political special advisers:

    Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury, Minister for the Civil Service

    First Secretary of State and Deputy Prime Minister

    Chancellor of the Exchequer

    Secretary of State for the Home Department

    Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

8 Jul 1996 : Column WA6

    President of the Board of Trade and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

    Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons

    Secretary of State for the Environment

    Secretary of State for Social Security

    Chief Secretary to the Treasury

    Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

    Secretary of State for National Heritage

    Secretary of State for Education and Employment

    Secretary of State for Defence

    Secretary of State for Health

    Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Lords

    Secretary of State for Transport

    Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food

    Secretary of State for Scotland

    Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister in charge of the Office of Public Service

    Secretary of State for Wales

    Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury and Chief Whip

    Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

International Whaling Commission Meeting, 24th-28th June

Lord Gray of Contin asked Her Majesty's Government:

    What was the outcome of the International Whaling Commission meeting held in Aberdeen on 24th-28th June 1996.

Lord Lucas: The International Whaling Commission's 48th annual meeting was held in Aberdeen from 24th to 28th June. The UK delegation was composed of officials from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, assisted by officials from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Department of the Environment and representatives of environmental organisations.

The United Kingdom's principal objective at this meeting was to ensure that the moratorium on commercial whaling, which has been in force since 1986, was not weakened in any way. I am pleased to report that this was achieved. A request by Japan for a quota of 50 minke whales for its coastal communities, which we and many others considered would have breached the moratorium, was once again rejected. The UK's opening statement made it clear that we would continue to oppose all efforts to end the moratorium.

The UK and New Zealand put forward a proposal for a ban on the use of the electric lance, which is used to kill whales that are wounded, but not killed, by an explosive harpoon. Although this received a wide measure of support; it did not secure the majority of three-quarters of those voting needed for adoption under

8 Jul 1996 : Column WA7

IWC rules. However, it was clear that our argument that the electric lance is inhumane was widely accepted; even many of those who voted against a formal ban did not favour continued use of the electric lance. Japan, while continuing to defend its use of the electric lance, indicated that it planned to undertake research into possible alternatives and would be reporting the results to the next IWC meeting. The IWC will be returning to this issue then.

The United States presented a proposal for an aboriginal subsistence whaling quota of five grey whales for its Makah Indian Tribe, and the Russian Federation sought a quota of five bowhead whales for indigenous peoples in Siberia. Both proposals aroused a good deal of concern, and as discussions progressed it became evident that neither was likely to obtain the three-quarters majority needed for adoption. In these circumstances, both the United States and the Russian Federation withdrew their proposals.

Little progress was made on developing a Revised Management Scheme (RMS), which is being devised to regulate all aspects of any future commercial whaling which might be permitted in the future. The United Kingdom continues to participate constructively in this work, as we believe that if commercial whaling ever did resume it would be essential to have in place tough and enforceable procedures to ensure that whaling only took place on stocks that were at healthy levels and was on a fully sustainable basis. The IWC did, however, endorse new guidelines on carrying out surveys and on calculating estimates of whale numbers; it also agreed new procedures designed to ensure better IWC oversight of these activities.

At the Scientific Committee Meeting there was a lengthy discussion of new estimates of minke whale numbers in the North East Atlantic. The Committee eventually agreed that the most recent estimate, derived from a survey carried out in 1995, was adequate for use in the Revised Management Procedure (the part of a future RMS under which catch limits for a particular stock would be calculated) and Norway claimed that this justified its decision to increase the number of whales it is planning to take this year under its commercial whaling operations. Most countries, however, continue

8 Jul 1996 : Column WA8

to believe that Norway's whaling activities weaken both the moratorium and the authority of the IWC, and a resolution was adopted by a large majority calling on Norway to reconsider its objection to the moratorium (under which Norway is legally entitled to continue commercial whaling) and to halt all commercial whaling operations immediately. The UK strongly supported this resolution.

We also supported a resolution calling on Japan to stop its scientific whaling and, in particular, to halt all scientific whaling within the Southern Ocean Sanctuary. Again, this was adopted by a very large majority.

In the Scientific Committee the outcome of the recent workshop on the effects of climate change on cetaceans was discussed, and steps were agreed to take forward work in this important issue. These were fully endorsed by the IWC itself through a resolution adopted by consensus. It was agreed, in particular, that the Scientific Committee would set up a standing working group to co-ordinate its work on environmental change, and that it would seek increased co-operation with other international organisations working in this field.

A number of other issues were discussed during this meeting. The UK introduced a resolution on small cetaceans, which was adopted by consensus, drawing attention to earlier resolutions on threatened species of small cetaceans and encouraging the Scientific Committee to continue to identify species under threat and to advise on possible remedial action. A resolution was adopted on whalewatching; this endorsed guidelines proposed by the Scientific Committee and drew these to the attention of coastal states responsible for regulating whalewatching. Resolutions were also adopted on improving controls on trade in whalemeat and calling on Canada, which withdrew from the IWC in 1982, to rejoin the IWC if it wishes to authorise aboriginal subsistence whaling.

Overall, this was a satisfactory meeting for the UK, and we achieved most of our objectives. While we were not successful in securing a ban on the use of the electric lance, we made encouraging progress and are well placed to take the issue up again next year at the IWC's 49th annual meeting, which will take place in Monaco in October 1997.

8 Jul 1996 : Column WA7

   Back to Table of Contents Lords Hansard Home Page