The Big Society - Public Administration Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Just Lincolnshire Equality & Human Rights Council (BS 117)

Just Lincolnshire is a registered charity, initially funded by the Equality & Human Rights Commission. Our Board, which represents many interests across local communities, is partnering local business and other events; we are therefore well-placed to offer a balanced view on "Big Society".

This memorandum has been informed in particular by the Chair's attendance at the "Reform" National Big Society Conference on 31 March 2011 (addressed by the Rt. Hon. Oliver Letwin MP). Also, by a subsequent roundtable seminar with Lord Wei of Shoreditch. These views are informed by the author's longstanding District council community focus group membership, accessing the local views of minority community leaders who are themselves providing services.

Just Lincolnshire would draw the committee's attention to current social exclusion in society. Also to our concern that Big Society initiatives would actually increase and reinforce those social and cultural divisions which occur locally when minority communities are unable to participate equally. Economic conditions are adversely affecting the capacity of those groups least able to work "unpaid" - thus the disabled, BME groups, womens' groups and carers (who have additional protection under the equality act 2010) are less likely to participate than those with time and disposable income.

Where people are socially excluded locally, they tend to travel further to link with similar communities elsewhere: mosque, disability centre, gay bar, Synagogue etc.

The Committee, we feel, should give weight to two questions:

1.  What evidence exists of Equality Impact assessment/analsyis being undertaken on Big Society implementation, under existing Equality legislation?

2.  How Big Society implementation accords with previous parliamentary recommendations on improving public participation in government (to what extend differentiation/experiences of minority group access has been taken into account?)

We welcome the entrepreneurial shift toward localism, but feel that stronger communities are those which actually use their strength to respect differences. Previous studies (Profiles of Prejudice Stonewall) show emphatically that individuals who "know" a member of a minority group are less likely to be prejudiced against that group. Should the Big Society fail to encourage joint participation across communities and cultures, then racism, community tensions and segregation would increase, as would crime and the fear of crime.

The lack of any "mapping" of what is already happening - when power is devolved (say, to Parish Councils) is also a concern. Are such body's representative of the communities they serve in terms of age and background? Do they include tenants and those living alone? We are therefore concerned that, as a result of recent policy shifts in Equality, the value of "Equality Impact assessment" as a tool to promote fairness and minimise making things worse - has been apparently sidelined.

July 2011




 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 14 December 2011