The Big Society - Public Administration Committee Contents


Written evidence submitted by Hitchin Bridge Club (BS 06)

This submission relates not to the transfer to or commissioning of public service contracts from the third sector but to another aspect of the Big Society idea which is the transfer of community buildings and the responsibility for the management thereof to local community groups.

On 1 February 2011 the Hitchin Bridge Club became the first ever UK mind sports organisation to be granted charitable status. In its decision the Charities Commission were satisfied that bridge was a sport within the definition of the Charities Act 2007, that the facilities provided by the club were capable of improving conditions of life and were provided to the public at large.

The club currently plays bridge in a community hall hired from the local authority. It runs two evening sessions and a teaching class for complete beginners. It would like to increase the number of sessions and introduce a daytime teaching class for people who for a variety of reasons cannot or prefer not to travel to the venue in the evenings.

The hall was built in the 1960's mainly of wood and is situated in the centre of a town park. It is unsuitable and uneconomic for modern community use, is energy inefficient and non versatile in the layout of its facilities.

It is currently a drain on the local authority's resources. The local authority wish to demolish the building and landscape more of the park. They have however no intention of rebuilding the hall in its current location, in another part of the park or elsewhere in the town. This intention would reduce the community space in the town available for hire.

As well as use by the charity the hall is used by an over 60's social club, an Age Concern run Asian lunch club, an art group for mentally disabled adults and an Afro-Caribbean lunch club. If it had more flexible accommodation and more up to date facilities it would be heavily used by an even wider spectrum of community groups and would be used for additional sessions by the charity.

The Hitchin Bridge Club has made a proposal to the local authority (the North Herts District Council) to build a new club and community building at the edge of the park and is asking that a suitable piece of land should be transferred to the charity to achieve this. The charity would be responsible for raising the funds to construct the building though it would hope for a contribution from the Council (possibly from section 106 monies intended for community use)

This proposal would achieve the following:

—  provide modern attractive flexible facilities owned by the charity for use by all the community;

—  allow the removal of the existing building enhancing the park environment;

—  include the demolition of a disused and vandalised toilet block the footprint of which would be incorporated in the new building. This is currently an eyesore on the main street;

—  transfer the running and management of the building to the charity with no long term cost on Council finances thus saving the Council money;

—  be energy efficient; and

—  offer greater security and safety for the building and its users (the current building has been the target of vandalism in recent years).

The following problems have arisen which the charity hopes the vision of a Big Society and the Localism Bill can address. These include::

—  the unwillingness of Council officers to consider proposals which do not fit in with their previous ideas, their reluctance to be innovative or creative or to listen with an open mind to suggestions;

—  the large number of different departments within the Council that need to be consulted and involved. This includes environment, parks and gardens, halls and centres, planning to name but a selection (this list is not exhaustive);

—  the complex procedures and red tape that is involved (eg re transfer of assets, valuations, consultations, planning etc); and

—  the impression that you are not being taken seriously.

March 2011



 
previous page contents next page


© Parliamentary copyright 2011
Prepared 14 December 2011