Mortgage arrears and access to mortgage finance - Treasury Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 89-99)

MS JACKIE BENNETT, MR ERIC LEENDERS, MR ADRIAN COLES, MR PETER WILLIAMS AND MR JOHN SOCHA

30 JUNE 2009

  Q89 Chairman: Welcome to the second part of our session. Can you introduce yourselves for the shorthand writer, please?

  Ms Bennett: I am Jackie Bennett. I am Head of Policy at the Council of Mortgage Lenders.

  Mr Coles: I am Adrian Coles, Director-General of the Building Societies Association.

  Mr Leenders: Eric Leenders, the Executive Director responsible for retail banking at the British Bankers' Association.

  Mr Socha: John Socha, Vice-Chairman of the National Landlords Association.

  Mr Williams: Peter Williams, Executive Director of the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association. That is the trade body for lenders who lend through intermediaries.

  Q90  Chairman: Welcome. I will put my first question to the Council of Mortgage Lenders. We heard in the first session about the forecast by the economist, Ian Shepherdson that repossessions will hit 100,000 to 120,000 by 2011. Are your figures at variance with that?

  Ms Bennett: We have only put out a forecast for 2009, we have not predicted forward, partly because we think it is too uncertain in terms of what happens in the economy, what happens with unemployment, for us to be able to make that forward prediction. Would you like me just to run through that?

  Q91  Chairman: Yes, sure.

  Ms Bennett: In terms of our forecast for 2009 we originally had a figure of 75,000 possessions for this year but we have actually revised that downwards to 65,000 for this year as a result of lower interest rates which is enabling people to be able to work with their lenders to stay in their homes. Also, as a result of lender forbearance, which is increasing, lenders are keeping more people in their homes, and as a result of Government initiatives which are encouraging more people to engage with their lenders or with money advice which, again, is enabling people to work together to be able to stay in their homes. As I say, we have revised that forecast down this year.

  Q92  Chairman: I have got a couple of points from that. Unemployment is predicted to rise sharply over the next few months, say, and some people are talking about three million unemployed and, indeed, the departing MPC member, Danny Blanchflower, is saying by 2012 it could be four million unemployed. What would be the impact of an increase in unemployment, say first of all to three million, on the number of households in mortgage arrears and being repossessed?

  Ms Bennett: We have not done that calculation. As I say, we restricted ourselves to looking at what might happen this year. We have indicated in our forecast document that if unemployment does continue to rise as predicted that will have a knock-on impact on arrears and possessions potentially going forward effectively worsening the position. There are obviously other factors at play here and we have not done that "If you get three million unemployed, what number of possessions would that equate to?" We simply have not done that calculation.

  Q93  Chairman: Are there any comments about how sensitive the levels of repossessions will be to the interest rates?

  Ms Bennett: We believe that it will be a combination of factors. Unemployment is clearly a key driver, and we believe not just unemployment but other factors around things like people will not get the overtime or the bonuses that they are expecting, perhaps will not get the pay rises they are expecting, and that will all feed through into that. Interest rates is clearly a factor. Lenders are telling us that because of the lower interest rates people are more able to make their payments. Moving people to something like interest-only is a much more realistic option at the moment because interest rates are so low. Again, a combination of higher unemployment, reduced unemployment and higher interest rates would have a serious effect potentially on arrears and possessions.

  Mr Williams: If I may, Chairman, all of us would take the view that lower interest rates have been an absolutely key factor in keeping the lid on arrears and possessions. If interest rates begin to rise that is clearly a factor alongside unemployment, and I think in all the submissions that have been put in to the Committee there is a general view that next year it is possible that numbers will go up, it all depends on sets of circumstances. The most important factor going forward is restoring a normal mortgage market, a normal housing market, which allows households to trade out of their difficulties. In reality, of all the schemes that have come into play, the one that is most effective for most people is simply trading in the market.

  Q94  Ms Keeble: I wanted to ask about mortgage lenders' behaviour. You heard the comments in the first half about the level of fees which are being charged for managing arrears. What is your comment on them because some of the levels are quite outrageous?

  Mr Coles: Someone mentioned that Nationwide ended charges as soon as an agreement had been reached with the borrower and, in fact, that is general policy across the entire building society sector. I would argue that building societies especially are not guilty of the crime that is being suggested. I suspect most mainstream lenders would also come into that category, not just building societies.

  Q95  Ms Keeble: Let us hear from CML and then look at some of the evidence.

  Ms Bennett: In terms of the wider mortgage market it is certainly included in our industry guidance that it is good practice if somebody is in an arrangement to pay that they should not be charged a fee for that arrangement. There is a case that lenders are allowed under the same rules to charge a fee for the additional work that having somebody in arrears can cause. There is a balance to be struck because if that cost is not borne by those people who are in arrears it has to be passed on to the wider population, so everybody's mortgages would be more expensive.

  Q96  Ms Keeble: Some of the evidence that was given earlier was that one firm was actually recouping its advertising fees through these charges, so it was not the case that what was being recouped were costs that would have otherwise gone to the general population.

  Ms Bennett: That is something which the FSA is investigating.

  Q97  Ms Keeble: Is the FSA investigating that currently?

  Ms Bennett: Yes.

  Q98  Ms Keeble: Do you know which organisation that is?

  Ms Bennett: No, I do not.

  Q99  Ms Keeble: It is a bank presumably, is it?

  Ms Bennett: We do not know. They have not said. They have simply said it is four firms they are looking at for enforcement action and one of the issues they are considering is the charges that lenders make for people in arrears.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 8 August 2009