Select Committee on European Scrutiny Eighth Report


10 EU Special Representatives

(28295)


(28296)


(28297)


(28298)


(28299)


(28300)


(28301)

Council Joint Action extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union in Sudan

Council Joint Action extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union for the South Caucasus

Council Joint Action extending and amending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union for the Middle East peace process

Council Joint Action extending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union for Afghanistan

Council Joint Action appointing the Special Representative of the European Union for the African Great Lakes Region

Council Joint Action appointing the Special Representative of the European Union for Moldova

Council Joint Action extending and amending the mandate of the Special Representative of the European Union for Central Asia

Legal baseArticles 14, 18.5, and 23.2; QMV
DepartmentForeign and Commonwealth Office
Basis of considerationEM of 24 January 2007
Previous Committee ReportNone
To be discussed in Council12 February 2007 General Affairs and External Relations Council
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionCleared, but further information requested

Background

10.1 EU Special Representatives (EUSR) are appointed to represent Common Foreign and Security Policy where the Council agrees that an additional EU presence on the ground is needed to deliver the political objectives of the Union. They were established under Article 18 of the 1997 Amsterdam Treaty and are appointed by the Council. The aim of the EUSRs is to represent the EU in troubled regions and countries and to play an active part in promoting the interests and the policies of the EU.

10.2 An EUSR is appointed by Council through the legal act of a Joint Action. The substance of his or her mandate depends on the political context of the deployment. Some provide inter alia a political backing to an ESDP operation, others focus on carrying out or contributing to developing an EU policy. All EUSRs carry out their duties under the authority and operational direction of the High Representative (Javier Solana). Each is financed out of the CFSP budget implemented by the Commission. Member States contribute regularly e.g. through seconding some of the EUSR's staff members.

10.3 In June 2005 the Political and Security Committee decided that EUSR mandates should in principle be extended for 12 months rather than the previous arrangement of 6 months. This was put into effect in February 2006. The UK supported this proposal, as it enables extensions to be based on a more thorough reporting cycle. The renewed mandates now also ask EUSRs to prepare progress reports in mid-June and mandate implementation reports in mid-November.

10.4 The activities of each of these seven Special Representatives in different regions of the world is helpfully summarised by the Minister for Europe (Mr Geoffrey Hoon) at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in his 24 January 2007 Explanatory Memorandum. His comments on each one are in italics beneath the summary

SUDAN

10.5 Pekka Haavisto, a former Finnish Minister, was appointed EUSR for Sudan in July 2005. He is mandated to ensure that the EU assists the Sudanese parties, the African Union and the UN in achieving a political settlement of the conflict in Darfur, including through the implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA). He is also tasked with facilitating the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), as well as facilitating the implementation of the Eastern Sudan Peace Agreement (ESPA), with due regard to the regional ramifications of these issues and to the principle of African ownership. He is also tasked with ensuring maximum effectiveness and visibility of the EU's contribution to the AU Mission in Sudan (AMIS).

The EU Special Representative for Sudan, Pekka Haavisto, has played an important role since his appointment, particularly during the Darfur Peace talks in Abuja, Nigeria, which led to the signing of the Darfur Peace Agreement in May 2006. Since then, Haavisto has taken an active role in pressing both the Sudanese government and Darfur rebels to accept and implement the agreement.

The EU Special Representative has also had an active role in helping to implement both the Comprehensive Peace Agreement for Sudan, signed in January 2005, and the East Sudan Peace Agreement signed in September 2006. The EU Special Representative also acts as an important channel of contact with the African Union. His work has led to a strengthening of the EU's political role in the various peace processes under way for Sudan, in particular the Darfur crisis, and has helped ensure consistency in the EU's work in Darfur and its overall political relations with Sudan.

10.6 The Minister adds that the Sudan EU Special Representative's mandate was renewed in July 2006 for six months in order for it to match the other EU Special Representative mandate cycles, the intention being to renew the mandate for twelve months in February 2007. However, Mr Haavisto has decided to leave his post at the end of April 2007, so the Joint Action is therefore only being extended until then; once the identity of the new EU Special Representative is known, a new Joint Action will be submitted which extend the mandate until January 2008.

SOUTH CAUCASUS

10.7 Peter Semneby was appointed EUSR for the South Caucasus on 20 February 2006. He is tasked with: assisting Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia in carrying out political and economic reforms; preventing conflicts in the region and contributing to the peaceful settlement of conflicts, including through promoting the return of refugees and internally displaced persons; and encouraging and supporting further cooperation between States of the region, including on economic, energy and transport issues.

10.8 His mandate was amended in 2005 to reflect the EU's gradually developing approach to the vacuum left on the Georgian border with Chechnya, Dagestan and Ingushetia (in Russia) following the closure of the OSCE border monitoring mission in Georgia at the end of 2004. The EU Special Representative's Office has been bolstered by a support team to provide the EU with reporting and a continued assessment of the border situation and to facilitate confidence-building between Georgia and the Russian Federation. The team assists the Georgian Border Guard and other relevant government institutions in Tbilisi. Additionally, it is mandated to follow-up on the reform of the criminal justice system, work which was started by the EU Rule of Law mission to Georgia in July 2004.

The Government supports the EU's closer engagement in this region, including the extension of the European Neighbourhood Policy to Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia and the recent adoption of European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plans with all three countries. The EU Special Representative will play a key role in supporting the three South Caucasus countries in implementing the reforms set out in their Action Plans over the coming year. While the EU does not have a direct role in the mechanisms seeking to resolve the frozen conflicts in the South Caucasus, the EU Special Representative's mandate enables him to contribute effectively to the conflict resolution process wherever the EU can add value.

MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS

10.9 Marc Otte was appointed EUSR for the Middle East Peace Process on 14 July 2003. His mandate is based on the EU's policy objectives which include a two-State solution with Israel and a democratic, viable, peaceful and sovereign Palestinian State living side-by-side within secure and recognised borders enjoying normal relations with their neighbours in accordance with UN Security Council Resolutions 242, 338, 1397 and 1402 and the principles of the Madrid conference.

10.10 The EUSR offers advice and conveys the position of the EU to all parties, thereby contributing to the implementation of EU policy on the process as agreed by the Council of Ministers. He also represents the EU in meetings of the Quartet (UN, EU, Russia and the US) at Envoys level.

The Middle East Peace Process remains at a crucial stage. Following Hamas' election in January 2006, the international community — led by the Quartet — set out three principles that all members of a future Palestinian government must be committed to, and that future assistance to any new government would be reviewed by donors against these principles. The EU Special Representative has been a key player in the EU's creative response to the political situation, so that our long-standing support of the Palestinian people can continue despite Hamas' failure to accept the Quartet principles. The Commission introduced the UK-inspired Temporary International Mechanism (TIM) to address the needs of the Palestinian people. In 2006, €680 million was given by the EU to the Palestinians, the largest amount ever given in a single year. Of that, €200 million was transferred through the mechanism, providing assistance to the most vulnerable Palestinians. The EU Special Representative also has an integral role in the chain of command for the EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM), which is monitoring the border at Rafah.

The EU Special Representative was the key figure in the European Security and Defence Policy Mission to support the Palestinian police (EUPOL COPPS). The purpose of the mission is to build the capacity of the Palestinian Civil Police. The mission was headed by the UK's Jonathan McIvor, who was replaced in December 2006 by another UK national, Colin Smith.

Following the election of Hamas, EUPOL COPPS has focused its activity on assessing the Civil Police's capacity and the needs of the wider criminal justice system and security sector. Scoping work for possible re-engagement in specific areas (should the politics change) also continues. A review of mission activity saw consensus amongst EU Member States that the mission should remain in place given its political significance and the importance of the EU being able to re-engage when the politics permitted. The UK hopes that the EU Special Representative will continue to promote security sector reform working with the US Security Co-ordinator, General Dayton. The Government judges that the role of the EU Special Representative remains an important tool of EU policy towards the Peace Process and therefore supports the renewal of the EU Special Representative's mandate.

AFGHANISTAN

10.11 Francesc Vendrell was appointed EUSR in Afghanistan on 25 June 2002. His mandate is to support the Afghan Government, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mr Koenigs, and to liaise with neighbouring and regional countries to achieve the implementation of the Union's policy in Afghanistan.

The London Conference on Afghanistan (31 January — 1 February 2006) launched the "Afghanistan Compact" which marks a new phase in the international community's engagement in Afghanistan. The Compact underlines continuing international support for Afghanistan, to develop increasing Afghan ownership of the process, to commit Afghanistan to clear timelines and benchmarks for progress, to deliver more effective international donor activity, and to ensure a continuing strong role for the UN. The European Commission is finalising a Country Strategy Paper for Afghanistan covering the period 2007-10. Conclusions adopted at the December 2006 European Council reaffirmed EU commitment to the reconstruction of Afghanistan, including through the possible deployment of a European Security and Defence Policy civilian mission in the field of policing with linkages to the wider rule of law. The role of the Special Representative will be central in driving the EU effort and ensuring the appropriate visibility for EU activity.

GREAT LAKES

10.12 Aldo Ajello was appointed EUSR for the African Great Lakes Region on 25 March 1996. Mr Ajello has worked closely with the UN and the African Union and with the prominent African figures who are assisting the international community's efforts. He maintains constant contact with the governments of the countries in the region. Although Mr Ajello himself will be stepping down at the end of the current term, the role of EUSR continues to be an important one in the Great Lakes. The EU is currently considering new candidates.

10.13 The mandate of the EUSR will continue to reflect the EU Special Representative's additional responsibilities in the chain of command of the European Security and Defence Policy Mission advising and assisting the Congolese authorities in security sector reform (EUSEC RD Congo) established in May 2005. It will be amended to take into account the new democratically elected government in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

The EU Special Representative for the Great Lakes has been helpful in mediating between the Congolese parties and keeping pressure on all sides in order to complete a successful and historic election process. He has access at high levels. He has also played a role in trying to accelerate and co-ordinate international efforts to find a resolution to the problem of disarming the FDLR (Rwandan Hutu rebels resident in the Democratic Republic of Congo) and other foreign armed groups in the Democratic Republic of Congo. He pushed the Security Sector Reform agenda, and will be important in guiding the work of the EU's future engagement on Security Sector Reform in the Democratic Republic of Congo. All of these are issues central to long-term stability in the country.

The peace in Great Lakes region remains fragile and political challenges lie over the coming year. The EU has increasing influence in the region, through financial support and technical assistance and contributed massively to the elections. The EU Special Representative holds all of these European efforts together. The Government supports an extension for a further 12 months.

MOLDOVA

10.14 Adriaan Jacobovits de Szeged was appointed EUSR for Moldova on 23 March 2005. His mandate is focused on strengthening the EU's contribution to the resolution of the Transnistria conflict in close coordination with the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). He also contributes to EU policy in other areas, including improving EU-Moldova relations, contributing to the strengthening of democracy and the rule of law, and assisting in the fight against trafficking of weapons, other goods and people. His role also complements the work of the European Commission's office, which opened in Moldova in October 2005, including on implementation of the EU-Moldova European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan.

The appointment of Adriaan Jacobovits de Szeged as EU Special Representative for Moldova in March 2005 coincided with a period of relative progress in efforts to resolve the frozen conflict in Transnistria. Since his appointment, the EU Special Representative has contributed to maintaining the momentum by representing the EU for the first time as an observer in the Transnistria settlement talks (in October 2005). The EU Special Representative has also played a key role in implementing the EU's Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM). The Mission aims to provide effective control of the Ukrainian-Moldovan border, particularly the Transnistrian segment. As the Transnistrian regime derives much of its income from smuggling across the Moldovan-Ukrainian border, the Mission has put pressure on it for the first time. The replacement EU Special Representative will also continue to provide expert advice on Moldova's progress against its European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan.

10.15 The Minister adds that Mr Jacobovits will step down as EUSR at the end of February 2007, and that the Political and Security Committee EU plans to make a decision on his successor by the end of February.

CENTRAL ASIA

10.16 The EU established a Special Representative for Central Asia in September 2005 to ensure coordination and consistency of external EU actions in the region. Jan Kubis, the former Secretary-General of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, was appointed to this position. Mr Kubis resigned in July 2006 and Mr Pierre Morel was appointed in September 2006.

10.17 His mandate is based on contributing to the strengthening of democracy, rule of law, good governance and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Central Asia. It is also focused on enhancing EU effectiveness and visibility in the region, including through a closer coordination with other relevant partners and international organisations, such as the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe. The mandate has been amended to allow the Special Representative to contribute to wider Common Foreign and Security Policy work on energy security, and to help develop bilateral energy cooperation with important producer and transit partners in Central Asia.

The Government welcomed the creation of an EU Special Representative for Central Asia and the appointment of Jan Kubis in September 2005. Kubis had already established good contacts in each of the countries of the region as well as with other key actors from Russia, the US and China. He had indicated a desire to work more closely with the EU Special Representative for Afghanistan during the next period of his mandate, which will be important in encouraging greater regional co-operation and hopefully ensuring a more co-ordinated EU approach. He resigned in July 2006 to become Foreign Minister of the Slovak Republic. Mr Pierre Morel was appointed EU Special Representative in September 2006. Mr Morel has travelled widely in the region. He has drafted a new EU Central Asia Strategy and contributed to EU discussions on policy towards the region.

The EU Special Representative's report on the situation in Uzbekistan in August 2005 played a role in persuading EU partners that it was necessary to introduce restrictive measures on the country in response to their disproportionate response to unrest in the city of Andizhan. EU relations with Uzbekistan remained tense in 2006, but the EU Special Representative has provided an important channel for continued dialogue. Pierre Morel was able to visit Uzbekistan in Autumn 2006 which contributed to an improvement in EU-Uzbekistan relations. More broadly, the EU Special Representative will continue to provide a common focus for delivering EU messages not just on key human rights issues, but also on the benefits of regional co-operation and on potential EU co-operation and technical assistance in helping the region to address some of its shared socio-economic difficulties. The amendment also allows him to inform wider thinking on external energy relations.

10.18 The UK currently pays approximately 18% into the CFSP budget, from which the costs of the EUSRs is met. The Minister says that the costs for 2007 will be:

—  EUSR Sudan:  to be determined once a successor is known;

—  Great Lakes:  €1,025,000 (£686,750);

—  Middle East:  €1,700,000 (£1,139,000);

—  Afghanistan:  to be agreed;

—  Moldova:  €1,100,000 (£737,000);

—  Central Asia:  €1,000,000 (£670,000);

—  South Caucasus:  €3,120,000 (£2,090,400).

Conclusion

10.19 We are reporting the situation to the House because of the widespread interest in Common Foreign and Security Policy, of which the EU Special Representatives are a key component. Their activity illustrates vividly the breadth and depth of CFSP within a decade of its inception. All would appear to have a role to play; all seem to be doing a good job, within the bounds of the possible. We have no questions to put to the Minister at present.

10.20 However, we note the likelihood of a European Security and Defence Policy civilian mission in Afghanistan, and of the drawing up of a Central Asia Strategy. The former would, of course, be submitted in the normal way; we should be grateful if, when the time comes, the Minister's Explanatory Memorandum would explain the Country Strategy Paper to which he refers (which we assume is the customary framework document within which Commission-led technical assistance is delivered) and how that mission fits into it.

10.21 It is not clear what form the Central Asia Strategy will take and what the timescale is. However, we should be grateful if the Minister would tell us more about it at the appropriate stage, so that the House may be better informed of what is likely to be an increasingly important focus for both Member State and EU activity.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 13 February 2007