NHS Redress Bill [Lords]


[back to previous text]

Dr. Pugh: I am going to put away my 20-page speech, breaking the habit of a lifetime and going for cheap popularity by deferring my remarks until Report. I thank hon. Members for creating a reasoned and relaxed environment, to which I think the Minister has made a substantial contribution, and I thank you,Miss Begg, for having chaired proceedings in a similar relaxed and rational way.
Andy Burnham: I am grateful for those general statements of support for the Bill. There is obviously a difference of opinion as to the means by which we get to the goal that I think we share. The argument is on the means and the hon. Member for Billericay is absolutely right to say the scheme must have the confidence of patients. Let me just say quickly two things to him.
There will be a three-year review, and that is the point at which we will test some of these matters. The process has to be conducted fairly and properly or it will not have the confidence of patients. There will be an in-built presumption that the process will be done in the right way, or else the scheme will not work and patients will not have confidence in it. They will walk away and go to the courts. In-built in the scheme is the presumption that people will conduct the inquiry fairly and properly and try to work towards resolution, which in the end is what we all want. There is an element of a two-stage process, but we do not have the two schemes we would have had under the measures put forward by the hon. Member for Billericay. Let us return to those matters on Report, because there is clearly still some mileage in them.
Let me, too, now thank you, Miss Begg, for chairing our proceedings so well. The hon. Member for Congleton (Ann Winterton) has good reason to be grateful to you, because you have spared her the joys of this Committee.
I thank the Clerk, Dr. John Benger, who is used to my rambling in the Health Committee, and who has had more of it here. I also thank the Hansard writers, the attendants and, of course, the police, for dealing with annoying electrical noises this morning.
I thank my colleagues on the Committee, who have contributed well, and I think that there is no difference between us. My hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Erdington has been pressing me for a little more on Report, and we will think about that; we will carry on discussions with him and see where they lead us. My hon. Friend has contributed extremely well to our proceedings, representing the organisation with which he is involved properly and in a fine way, and I pay tribute to him.
May I, too, thank the Whip, my hon. Friend the Member for Ogmore (Huw Irranca-Davies)? We have two Welsh firsts in the Committee: we have the framework power, and this is my hon. Friend’s first Committee. So we have two firsts for the Welsh, although they are not enjoying such prominence in Germany, but never mind—perhaps another time.
Lastly, I thank the hon. Member for Billericay for the way in which he and his hon. Friends have conducted the proceedings. This has been an amiable Committee, and I look forward to continuing our discussions on Report.
Question put and agreed to.
Bill, as amended, to be reported.
Committee rose at twenty-four minutes to Eleven o’clock.
 
Previous Contents
House of Commons 
home page Parliament home page House of 
Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 June 2006