Select Committee on Home Affairs Written Evidence


30.  Memorandum submitted by the National Probation Service for England and Wales

  Thank you for your letter of 24 February requesting supplementary information for the Inquiry into the Rehabilitation of Prisoners.

  In answer to the points raised in your letter:

1.  PROGRAMMES IN THE COMMUNITY

  Statistical data relating to the number of offenders undertaking educational programmes is given at Annex A for 2002-03 and 2003-04 (April 2003 to January 2004). The tables show the number of offenders assessed during these periods as well as the number of offenders commencing a basic skills programme (by type of supervision) and the number and level of awards achieved. We are only able to provide data about (i) offenders serving non-custodial (community) sentences and (ii) ex-offenders released back into the community under licence (see sections on Basic Skills Programme Commencements). We do not hold data on ex-offenders released without statutory supervision but who request access to such programmes.

  Annex B gives figures on the number of offenders undertaking Offending Behaviour or rehabilitative programmes in 2002-03 and provisional figures for 2003-04 (April to December only). The tables detail the numbers commencing and completing each programme during these periods.

  I have also attached at Annex C an informative summary that details and explains all the current Offending Behaviour Programmes currently being run by the National Probation Service. This table provides some useful background information on each of the Offending Behaviour Programmes and allows some context to be associated with the numbers detailed in Annex B.

  In terms of community penalties, Enhanced Community Punishment retains the punishment inherent in a community order but has a strong vocational element. It uses work to address employment-related and thinking skills.

  Data relating to other vocational programmes is not collected centrally. However, I can confirm that there are a number of schemes operating at a local level that provide vocational support for offenders.

2.  STAFFING LEVELS

  Annex D details the number of staff employed in the National Probation Service (NPS) by the 42 Probation Boards covering England and Wales, as at 30 September 2003. The tables provide a breakdown by grade of staff and region.

Reporting structures

  The National Probation Service for England and Wales was formed as a national service in April 2001 and comprises 42 areas. These areas are coterminous with police, court and crown prosecution areas.

  Responsibility for each of the 42 probation areas is vested by parliament in a probation board for that area. Each Board has a Chief Officer who serves as a Board Member and who is a statutory office holder appointed by the Home Secretary. In addition to this, there are 14 other Board Members; 1 x Chair, 1 judicial member appointed by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (formerly Lord Chancellor's Department) and 12 other independent local members who are appointed by Ministers.

  Probation Boards are accountable through the National Probation Directorate to the Home Secretary (as illustrated below).



  All staff of the 42 areas are employed by the relevant Probation Area Board. The Board is responsible for the recruitment, retention, remuneration and oversight of the day-to-day management of its employees, and for local area strategic planning, and financial and performance monitoring.

3.  OUTREACH WORK

  The National Probation Service values its relationship with the voluntary sector and encourages local probation areas to work in partnership with the voluntary sector and others to provide the most effective provision to reduce reoffending. The resettlement of offenders is an essential element in achieving this. However, it is for the local probation areas themselves to decide, in the light of their individual business plans, how this is best achieved. As part of a process to develop a more strategic approach in its relations with the voluntary sector, the National Probation Directorate has undertaken a mapping exercise of partnership arrangements between the 42 local probation areas in England and Wales and the voluntary sector. This has been followed by a regional consultation exercise to find out from local probation areas and voluntary sector organisations what factors they consider should be included in a more strategic approach. The mapping exercise was based on replies from 33 Probation Areas and gave information on 625 projects. Local probation area partnerships with the voluntary sector include work on drugs, accommodation advice, education, training and employment, alcohol, financial and welfare advice, community punishment, domestic violence and sex offending.

  In relation to funding, I can advise you that actual probation expenditure on services delivered by, or in partnership with voluntary sector organisations has increased by some £4 million over the past three years to an estimated £34 million. A great deal of this had been invested in projects with the voluntary sector. Of the current expenditure, £3.5 million is core funding provided by the National Directorate to support the central infrastructure of a small number of national organisations, but the bulk of the funding flows through the 42 probation boards to local organisations and projects.

Work with statutory partners

  Work undertaken by the National Probation Service in partnership with voluntary sector organisations is being taken forward alongside work with the Prison Service and with other Government Departments to develop a National Rehabilitation Strategy and Action Plan. The Action Plan, subject to final ministerial agreement, will address key themes identified in the Social Exclusion Unit Report on the resettlement of ex-prisoners. An important principle underpinning the strategy is that offenders should gain proper access to the "mainstream" services necessary for their rehabilitation. To this end, the prison and probation services are working together with other departments to agree an action plan and time-scales in relation to each identified theme by April 2004.

  The National Rehabilitation Strategy will address seven areas of need, or strategic pathways, critical to offender rehabilitation. These are:

    —  Accommodation

    —  Attitudes, thinking and behaviour

    —  Children and families

    —  Drugs and alcohol

    —  Education, training and employment

    —  Finance, benefit and debt

    —  Health.

  The delivery of services in these areas of need is supported by a number of cross-cutting delivery strategies which centre on case management, information exchange and regional strategies.

Regional Strategies

  Co-ordinated work at regional level is fundamental to effective delivery of resettlement work on the ground. To this end all probation regions, will be required to develop joint regional resettlement strategies with the Prison Service by March 2005. These strategies will closely mirror the central rehabilitation strategic themes. They will, as part of the NRS, require the establishment of delivery agreements at regional level with partners in the Correctional and Criminal Justice Services, statutory agencies and the voluntary and private sectors.

4.  JOINT INITIATIVES—PREPARATION FOR THE NATIONAL OFFENDER MANAGEMENT SERVICE (NOMS)

  Work on the National Rehabilitation Action Plan will feed into preparation for NOMS. In particular, the joint probation and prison service development of resettlement strategies at regional level and in Wales will help to pave the way for the delivery of an integrated service.

  Other initiatives currently being undertaken by the Probation Service and Prison Service that will contribute to an integrated service include:

    —  the establishment of a joint Criminal Justice Act Sentence Delivery Board to oversee preparation for the introduction of the new sentences. Of particular significance in this context will be the introduction of Custody Plus. Custody Plus will end the current situation where short-term prisoners are not subject to licence on release from custody;

    —  the Sentence Delivery Board is also overseeing the development of the joint case management process which will meet the SEU report's concern for continuity in case management from prison to the community, and which will co-ordinate the delivery of services to individual offenders by partner organisations. Case management is part of a core curriculum of joint work by the two services which also includes OASys—the joint risk-needs assessment tool-programmes to address offending behaviour, and a range of initiatives designed to support community reintegration.

  The prison and probation services are jointly steering a number of other resettlement projects, including the Prison Service Plus project. Provisional agreement has already been reached for this project to go forward under the auspices of NOMS. This work is being co-ordinated with steps to address the rehabilitation needs of persistent offenders and other priority groups, in particular in partnership with the police, as an integral part of work on the National Rehabilitation Strategy. Work has also begun on designing a NOMS centre including the appointment of a transition team. It is planned that the National Offender Manager and other strategic appointments will be made by 1 June. In taking forward the work of NOMS, proposals are being put forward to establish a number of regional pathfinder projects to test new joint delivery arrangements.

  In addition to the resettlement projects, there is also a good deal of other joint work being undertaken by the NPS and the Prison Service. One example is the work currently being done on Offending Behaviour Programmes (OBPs). The key objectives of joint working for these programmes include that wherever possible provisions to ensure joint planning and analysis of work are in place and that a co-ordinated approach to the development of programmes is achieved. Other objectives include the need to ensure that business changes are assessed for each organisation and that a common approach to training and support is developed along with the flexible use of resources. The implementation of NOMS will facilitate this further and allow for much closer collaborative working.

Stephen Murphy CBE

Director General, National Probation Service for England & Wales

25 March 2004


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 7 January 2005