Select Committee on European Scrutiny Second Report


1 EUROPEAN SPACE POLICY


(25038)
14886/03
COM(03)673  + ADD 1
Commission White Paper - Space: a new European frontier for an expanding Union - An action plan for implementing the European space policy.


Legal base
Document originated11 November 2003
Deposited in Parliament 15 November 2003
DepartmentTrade and Industry
Basis of consideration EM of 28 November 2003
Previous Committee Reports None; but see (24226) 5707/03: HC 63-xxx (2002-03), paragraph 15 (16 July 2003) and (24945) 12858/03: HC63-xxxv (2002-03), paragraph 13 (29 October 2003)
To be discussed in Council 11 March 2004
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionFor debate in European Standing Committee C

Background

  1.1  In January 2003 the Commission published its Green Paper, "Towards a European Space Policy". This was followed by a period of consultation which was completed in June 2003, when the Government submitted and published its response.[1]

The document

  1.2  The Commission has now published a White Paper, which outlines five policy objectives for the EU and suggests space activities that could be used to help achieve them. The objectives and examples of helpful space activities suggested are:

  • stronger economic growth, job creation and industrial competitiveness — satellite telecommunications might deliver broadband access to 20% of the EU's population;
  • a successful enlargement of the Union — the broadband possibility could contribute to closing a "digital divide" between existing and new Member States;
  • sustainable development — Earth observation satellites for measuring environmental impact;
  • stronger security and defence for all — providing autonomous access to reliable global information for decision-making in the Common Foreign and Security and European Security and Defence Policies; and
  • fighting poverty and aiding development — use of Earth observation satellites and global positioning systems in such matters as protecting soils or monitoring crop development and forecasting food production.

  1.3  The document aims to build on the Green Paper, the Community/European Space Agency (ESA) Framework Agreement[2] and the draft Constitutional Treaty produced by the Convention on the Future of Europe (which would make space a shared competence). It recommends increasing European involvement in the space sector, consolidating the existing scientific and technical basis of space activities and updating the institutional structure of both the Community and the ESA in order to give the EU greater power and responsibility in space activities. The White Paper also advocates doubling European (EU/ESA and Member States') space expenditure by 2010. It emphasises security and defence as areas of under-investment, but also seeks to promote comprehensive independence in space systems and growth in scientific research. This all implies a growing budget overall and a transfer of activities to Community competence, notably in relation to security and defence.

  1.4  The White Paper concludes with a recommendation that "The issues — as a whole — raised in this White Paper should now be discussed and decided upon in the relevant European institutions". We understand that it is likely that the Commission will propose Council Conclusions on space policy for adoption at the Competitiveness Council in March 2004.

The Government's view

  1.5  The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Science and Innovation, Department of Trade and Industry (Lord Sainsbury) says of the policy implications:

    "The UK is a strong supporter of the development of a common European space policy, and has been a major driver of the development of a closer working relationship between the EC, as a user of space resources, and the ESA, the technology providers. Such co-operation offers a common European approach, avoids duplication and offers a more secure industrial environment. The success so far of EC/ESA co-operation in developing the European Space Strategy and in the field of external relations with third parties is promising. The UK welcomed the European Space Strategy ("Europe and Space: Turning to a new Chapter")[3], published in September 2000. This was endorsed by the European Union and ESA Councils on 16 November 2000, the latter chaired by the UK.

    "The UK Government response to the Green Paper stressed the importance of a user-focused approach in all areas and was instrumental in achieving the inclusion of a call for a demand-driven space policy in the Paper. This is entirely consistent with the UK space policy for the past two decades and the draft UK Space Strategy. There are policy concerns about the references to defence and about the levels and sources of funding envisaged in the Paper, which make implicit assumptions about an increase in the Financial Perspective after 2007.

    "The UK welcomes a more active EU space policy, based on utilisation of space systems, but is extremely sceptical of the value-added by its potential involvement in launchers, space science and especially the International Space Station (ISS) and future human exploration of space. The UK response to the Green Paper made it clear that there should be no increase in EU spending on space-related R&D without a demand-driven approach.

    "The Paper mentions using space applications for a common European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). There is concern that the Commission is seeking to widen its competence to include ESDP, which remains a matter for Governments. The UK is also concerned by unqualified references to the dual-use of civil systems (i.e. the Galileo satellite navigation system). FCO and MoD are fully engaged in discussions on the White Paper.

    "It is in the UK interest for the Commission to produce a White Paper on space policy and we would not want the White Paper process to fail. However, there are some concerns about the issues it raises. It is to be hoped that, when it comes to making decisions on these proposals, the UK is engaged in the debate and can encourage those aspects of the European space policy that are very much in our interest, such as increased EU involvement in Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES).

    "Any decisions about CFSP and increases to the EU budget will be matters for Member States. There is considerable scepticism on their parts about many of the proposals. The White Paper can be seen as setting out the space community's case for being involved in meeting current and future EU policies in the longer term; it does not determine whether certain defence policies become reality and was written more in anticipation of a development of the role of the EU in defence under the Constitutional Treaty. Were this to happen, security and defence would nonetheless remain intergovernmental issues and the Commission's role would remain limited."

  1.6  In relation to the financial implications the Minister tells us:

    "The White Paper has no direct financial implications, as it does not contain specific proposals for spending. It is, however, important to bear the points in [the following paragraph] in mind.

    "ESA currently has several 'optional programmes', in which the UK does not take part, including the Ariane launcher programme, participation in the International Space Station and a strategy for manned space exploration. The White Paper proposes transferring the responsibility for future funding of some of these space programmes from member states to the EU. This could eventually mean UK fund[s] (through the EU budget) being allocated to prestige projects that it has previously avoided as poor value for money, in both commercial and scientific terms. It will be important to remain aware of this and to be involved in shaping European space policy from within."

Conclusion

  1.7  We are conscious that this is a comprehensive statement of the Commission's view of what a European space policy should consist of, that the UK has long supported the development of such a policy and that the UK might benefit greatly from an extensive and properly thought-out policy at the European level. However we are also conscious that this White Paper raises important issues and will probably be a significant milestone in the development of such a policy. We therefore recommend the document for debate in European Standing Committee C, which should take place before discussion of the White Paper in the Competitiveness Council in March 2004.

  1.8  We suggest that amongst the matters Members may wish to discuss are:

  • to what extent a comprehensive space policy is necessary and how real the prospective benefits are in relation to the Community's wider objectives;
  • the threatened encroachment by the Commission on Member State's defence and security competence;
  • the presumptions about possible treaty revisions as a result of the Inter-Governmental Conference;
  • the implied threat to the Council's understanding of the purely civil role of the GALILEO project;
  • the possible budgetary consequences of the Commission proposals.



1   See headnote. Back

2   See headnote. Back

3   (21697) 12213/00; see HC 23-xxix (1999-2000), paragraph 39 (15 November 2000). Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 22 December 2003