Select Committee on Procedure Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by Tam Dalyell MP, Father of the House

  1.   List of Speakers in Debates

  Should not be made avalable, as MPs will "blow in, blow up and blow out", with minimum time in the Chamber.

  2.   Conventions

  I am against time limits—8, 10, 12 or 15 minutes. If Michael Foot and John Mendelson had been confined to 8-15 minutes in 1967, Harold Wilson would have succumbed to Lyndon Johnson's request for a symbolic "battalion of bag pipers" (Johnson's words), and taken us into the Vietnam War! The Speaker should use his discretion to call people with an obvious "locus", rather than rely on "Buggins' Turn".

  3.   Printing Undelivered Speeches

  I'm against it. Who would read them? Besides "a speech is a speech", an article would be better. If no one writes an article, possibly the substance was not worth saying in the first place!

  4.   Private Members' Bills

  I think the occasional 10 Minute Rule Bill should be given a fair wind.

  5.   The Speaker's Role in the recall of the House

  It should be Mr Speaker, and the Speaker ALONE. I would like to give oral evidence on this crucial issue.

  6.  I regret that the opportunity for balloted Friday motions has been stolen from back benchers. In my 35 years of Friday debates, the topics chosen often resulted in action which would not otherwise have taken place.

  7.   The Royal Prerogative

  The Royal Prerogative always was suspect and has been ABUSED by this Prime Minister, in relation to potential war with Iraq.

2 February 2003


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 14 April 2003