Select Committee on European Scrutiny Twenty-Seventh Report



12. IMPLEMENTATION OF EC AID DURING 2000

 

(22903)

13744/01

Report on the implementation of European Commission external assistance.

Legal base:

   

Department:

International Development

Basis of consideration:

Letter from Chairman of International Development Committee of 23 April 2002

Previous Committee Report:

HC 152-ix, paragraph 9 (5 December 2001)

Discussed in Council:

8 November 2001 Development Council

Committee's assessment:

Politically important

Committee's decision:

Cleared

 

 

Background

  12.1  Publication of an Annual Report on implementation of EC aid was one of the principal recommendations of the May 1999 Development Council. This first report covers activities during 2000. It is the first time that information on all the EC programmes has been put together in a single document.

  12.2  When we considered the report in December 2001, we expressed our support for the Secretary of State for International Development (Clare Short) who, whilst welcoming it as an important step forward, criticised it for falling short of the needs spelt out by the Development Council.

  12.3  We referred the document to the International Development Committee for its Opinion, in the context of its inquiry into The effectiveness of the reforms of European Development Assistance. The Chairman of that Committee writes to tell us that the Committee has now published its Report and gives its Opinion on the document at paragraph 60, in which it says:

"The first Annual Report on the Implementation of the European Commission's external assistance was published in January 2002. As a baseline report, it refers to the situation at 1 January 2001, the date of establishment of EuropeAid. We join with others, including Ministers attending the European Development Council on 8 November 2001, in welcoming the recognition that it is important to make such a report, but in being extremely disappointed with the structure and content of the report itself. The Annual Report makes no attempt to measure impact, fails to say how the Commission intends to measure impact in future, and neglects to discuss priorities or compare the different regional or sectoral programmes. The Annual Report is a step in the right direction, but a disappointingly small step, which must be improved upon next year".

Conclusion

  12.4  We thank the International Development Committee for its Opinion. As a result of the views expressed by the Development Council and supported by the International Development Committee, we would expect the next Annual Report to respect the needs of the Council in terms of structure and content.

  12.5  We now clear the document.

 


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2002
Prepared 13 May 2002