Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence

Annex E


  1.  Missile Defence is not, strictly speaking, an element of the work on the SDR New Chapter, although it is, of course, related to some of the issues that are being considered. It is an issue which was already in play before 11 September, is driven by a wider range of considerations, and is following a separate timetable.

  2.  The events of 11 September show that there are those who will seek to threaten with whatever means are available the US, its friends and allies. In the future this might include ballistic missiles. We agree with the US that a comprehensive strategy to tackle all these threats is needed.

  3.  We currently judge that it would be premature to decide on acquiring a ballistic missile defence capability for either UK territory or forces deployed overseas. This position is based on our assessment of the threat, the rapidity with which relevant defensive technologies are changing, and the need to evaluate further the potential role of missile defences as one element of a broad-ranging defence response to missile proliferation.

  4.  This does not mean that we have ruled out the acquisition of ballistic missile defences for the future. Our options remain open, and we understand the role that missile defences could play. Nationally, we continue to monitor developments in the risks posed by ballistic missiles and in the technologies available to counter them. We also fully support the ongoing NATO Theatre Missile Defence Feasibility Studies, and have a long-standing technical dialogue with the US on the subject.

previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2002
Prepared 7 March 2002